Rotec MKII TBI

Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 5:30 am

by NARROBB

Hello,

I got the MKII coming on the way, been getting ready to install it on a Jabiru 3300A replacing Bing 64, my understanding its direct replacement but some head scratching needs to be done for the throttle/prime/mixture cabling/routing.

Anyone installed Rotec MKII TBI on a Jab 3300? Any info and photos would help a lot.

Regarding the Prime on the Rotec TBI, i read somewhere someone used a solenoid to press the prime rather than cable and associated design, any tips or pointers on that subject will be great.

Cheers
NAR


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 6:58 am

by Brett

Sounds like a good idea re the elec solenoid idea. I have a mark 1 on my aerovee and installed a cable however. The only thing I guess to consider is the fact that if you do have an issue, and the regulator fails, it will probably fail with no fuel flowing and the primer is there also to get you home by over riding it as a fail safe. If an electric solenoid was used I suggest you get one that can stay energised for a long period not just a short on off type. I have often thought I need to change my cable to one that will stay out like a mixture cable. The one I have is just a normal pull cable with no hold feature. The thought of having to hold the cable out for the whole trip home if there was a problem leaves me a little nervous. Probably unlikely but I guess could happen. Just thinking about this now as I type, I wonder if the diaphragm has a life span or change out period in hours or years as part of a service schedule.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 5:11 pm

by NARROBB

Thank you Brett. Can’t you use the Choke type pull where you can rotate it to lock (pulled) in place without strain when you need to? Like this one http://1drv.ms/1Jeta5L

Post some photos of your cable setup for the primer if you don’t mind. If i can’t find a solenoid, going to have to use the cable!


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Thu May 14, 2015 8:23 am

by Brett

I possibly could use that type of cable. Worth a look into :slight_smile:
Next time I have the cowls off the plane, I will take a photo and post it up , no worries.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Thu May 14, 2015 10:48 am

by SonexN76ET

I am wondering if there has ever been a case where the regulator on a Rotec TBI failed and someone had to keep the primer depressed to keep the engine going? Will the engine run OK with the primer depressed for an extended period? In the Rotec literature they mention pressing the primer button a few times to clear out vapor lock if it were to occur. From what I understand, when you press the primer button it really let’s the fuel pour out. Can the engine run with that much fuel being released? I just fabricated my primer lever and A920 throttle cable attachment for my Rotec MkII TBI and am trying to decide on a cable setup for the primer. I am also going to put a spring on the primer level to pull the lever off the primer button when not purposely depressed.

Jake


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Thu May 14, 2015 3:34 pm

by WaiexN143NM

Hi jake,
First just want to say that we are extremely pleased with our rotec tbi mk 1 on our jab 3300 . Just a reminder when u prime make sure throttle is opened up full to expose the spray bar with all the holes, otherwise priming does nothing. Install instructions from rotec require a carb heat install, although many have done without like the aerocarb/aero injector. Can u get carb ice in a throttle body? That is a whole nother thread and discussion. We ordered the carb heat box and flow grid from aircraft spruce for the Ellison throttle body. The heat box was way too big to fit between the motor mount tubes so we made a smaller version of it and sent back to spruce. We did incorporate the flow grid piece, about $100 . Never tried without it , but hope it’s doing its job. Heat muffs that work and are small in size to fit the jab3300 exhaust you can get from wicks or spruce is the ‘cessna’ style. I believe u have the aerovee so u have more room on the exhaust pipes for bigger muffs. We have 2 , one for carb heat, one for cabin heat. We have never tried pulling the primer when in flight, need to try that , see how it affects the engine. Again the more open the throttle is the more of the spray bar is exposed, when priming.
Thanks for the input on the fuel tank fittings. It’s been a hot topic. One of the good topics amongst the builders/pilots on the flight line at Rio Linda fly in. When following the instruction via the sonex oops fittings , and after the drilling is done, how much plastic build up inside is still left? Any body else please feel free to chime in with thoughts, experiences, suggestions for the tank fittings
Cheers!!
WaiexN143NM
Michael Radtke


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Thu May 14, 2015 3:58 pm

by Waiex 49

Hi Mike,

It was good to see you at Rio Linda.

Regarding the amount of plastic that surrounds the fittings and remains after the drilling, in my case it was substantial. All of it had to be removed so that the o-rings had a flat surface to form a seal.

If you want to get an idea of how much plastic surrounds the tank fittings, remove your fuel cap and reach in with your fingers and feel around the backside of the fuel vent fitting. The fittings extend beyond the thickness of the tank wall and a considerable amount of plastic forms around the fitting.

The Sonex instructions call this a “ridge” but it is more like a little mountain of plastic. It all has to be removed to provide a smooth surface for the o-rings. I found this to be one of the more challenging aspects of installing the “oops” fittings.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Mon May 25, 2015 1:53 am

by nwyooper

I have a MKII Rotec TBI on my AeroVee. If anyone wants to see my mechanical primer, send me an email and I will send pics.
Loren
nwyooper@yahoo.com


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 1:45 pm

by 142YX

Anyone have any photos of their Rotec TBI control cable setups?

I received a new MKII in the mail yesterday.. and it appears as if one must use a heavy duty push-pull cable similar to these:

https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/ … ckkey=8714

for the throttle control. Was curious what other people have ended up using

Thanks!


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 6:39 pm

by fastj22

142YX wrote:Anyone have any photos of their Rotec TBI control cable setups?

I received a new MKII in the mail yesterday.. and it appears as if one must use a heavy duty push-pull cable similar to these:

https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/ … ckkey=8714

for the throttle control. Was curious what other people have ended up using

Thanks!

I think I’m getting mine next week too. I was thinking the same thing and attaching it to the top hole on the AeroConversions throttle quadrant.
Also thinking of using a longer coupling hose to move the carb away from the engine hoping for better atomization. My #6 always runs leaner. Any thoughts on that? Maybe a 45 or 90 degree bend using a silicon hose like this…
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/vpe-2740b/overview/

Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:23 pm

by SonexN76ET

I have posted a few pictures below to help those who may be installing a Rotec TBI Mk2. I CAN NOT YET ENDORSE this product because I have not done enough testing of it yet. Rotec’s directions are not as good as those of the AeroInjector. The AeroInjector technical support from Sonex is far superior.

Here is a picture from the front looking to the back of my Rotec TBI MK II. It shows both the mixture and the throttle cables. This picture shows the throttle with a cable from Aircraft Spruce which was not strong enough. I have replaced it with one from Steinjager that has a tough plastic outerwall over the metal cable sleeve. The throttle on the Rotec TBI MkII is extremely stiff. Rotec claims it will improve (get less stiff) with time.

And here is from the front looking at the mixture cable:


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:31 pm

by SonexN76ET

Here is a view from the side. The fuel line has an AN4 fuel/vapor return line on a T fitting along with the 6AN fuel line. I have a Facet fuel pump. The Rotec TBI will run without the pump on but you have to have at least two gallons in the tank to create sufficient fuel pressure without the pump on.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:35 pm

by SonexN76ET

Here is a picture of the primer lever and the mount for the push pull cable for the throttle.

Jake


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 11:07 pm

by fastj22

Jake,
No air filter?


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 11:12 pm

by SonexN76ET

I have not included pictures of the air filter in these series of photos. I can take some photos with my air straightener, air filter, carb heat, and induction plenum installed later in the week.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:49 pm

by SonexN76ET

Here is a picture of my Rotec installation with the air cleaner and the intake plenum. Carb heat comes in on the other side of the plenum. There is a flap that cuts out the ram air when you apply carb heat. The filter is a larger size K&N. It is E-3221.

I still have not completed my testing.

Some initial observations:The AeroInjector has better instructions. The tech support from Sonex is far superior in my experience. I also believe that Rotec made the tolerances too tight on the MKII TBI which make the throttle extremely stiff.

The keys to tuning the Rotec TBI are to have smooth incoming airflow, setting the idle mixture screw, setting a mechanical throttle stop at the appropriate setting, and setting full rich stops on the cockpit mixture control (mine will not run at the full rich setting at full throttle and required installing a stop.

Jake


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2015 8:57 pm

by lpaaruule

Hi Jake,

A friend of mine with a Zodiac 601 couldn’t get his Jabiru 3300 with Rotec TBI to run at full throttle, and initially put in a throttle stop. We ended up enlarging many of the holes in the spray bar from 0.3mm to 0.35mm (IIRC) with a small drill in a pin vice. Now his engine runs great at full throttle. We determined he was running way to lean at full throttle because his fuel flow was only 6.5 gal/hour according to his flow meter. Now it’s about 10 gal/hour at full rich. This was a last resort after adjusting the idle mixture screw to no avail.

I have a first gen Rotec TBI that was included with a Jabiru 3300 I bought from another builder. I remembered you commenting that you put an oops fitting on your tank in case you wanted to install a vapor return line. I’m very interested in doing the same thing, but hopefully I won’t need to used an oops fitting. I’m also considering removing the mechanical fuel pump from the engine (per Sonex instructions) and using an electric fuel pump. I’ve heard of the mechanical fuel pump actually heating the fuel because it’s mounted right on the engine. Besides, the plumbing could be simpler that way, and there would be less unpressurized fuel than by opting to used the mechanical fuel pump.

My thought is that I’d mount the fuel pump fuel pump on the firewall right before the gascolator. That way the fuel in the gascolator would be pressurized. I’m also thinking about putting a flow meter between the regulator and the TBI and either insulating it or using a blast tube to cool it. The fuel line upstream of the regulator would have a T-fitting that would have a vapor return line connected to it.

So I sort of have a plan, but I have to figure out which holes on the fuel tank I’m going to need to use, and for what. I’m thinking the top sight glass fitting would be good for the vapor return.

Any suggestions are appreciated.

Paul

BTW, my friend with the Zodiac also had a lot of frustration getting good tech support from Rotec. He politely confronted them about it at Oshkosh this year. He ended up sending all email questions to both tech support, and tech support’s wife. He has received more “timely” responses.


Re: Rotec TBI for sale

Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 9:44 am

by wolfpack3

I have a Rotec carb for sale. I’m asking $600.S/H included in the US. It is not a MKII. Excellent condition only used 10 hours. pictures upon request I have decided to go with a float bowl carb instead.
Please PM me if interested.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 1:26 pm

by SonexN76ET

Paul,

If you search this site with the keyword Rotec you will see that most of the people using Rotecs on a Sonex have a Jabiru. Most of the Jabiru users have positive comments about the Rotec TBI. There were very few photos of Rotecs on non turbo Aerovee engines for me to use in my planning.

Tony Spicer is currently building a Panther with a Rotec Mk I TBI on a Jabiru. He has some excellent photos on line of his very professional looking setup. I copied his air straightener which is thin honeycomb aluminum sandwiched between an aluminum frame that mounts on the intake mouth of the TBI.

As far as the fuel pump goes, I mounted mine in the cockpit on the firewall to protect it from heat and to be able to keep an eye on it. I could not figure a way to mount it on the firewall on the engine side. With the Facet fuel pump you are also required to have a fuel filter before the pump. I am still trying to figure out the best way to squeeze one in.

I looked at your builders log, you have a good looking aircraft under construction.

Jake


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2015 6:18 pm

by SonexN76ET

Here is a picture of an air straightener similar to the one I made for my Rotec TBI.

The grid itself is 1/2 inch thick.

A word of caution: One of the other builders has reported that they talked to Rotec about using ram air with a TBI at Oshkosh. He said that Rotec now recommends against using ram air. The Rotec website still references the use of ram air. So, what the Rotec technical support is saying is in conflict with the information on their website.

Ellison Fluid Systems (which the Rotec TBI copied) says that ram air can be used but you have to have a good induction system design for it to work. So please be careful.

Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:37 pm

by 142YX

Finally got the new Rotec TBI MKII installed into 142YX and attempted to fly with no luck. In fact.. the engine quit on me on the takeoff roll approximately 5 MPH before liftoff (thank goodness). I had done a series of engine runs with the following results leading up to the flight attempt:

  • Idles strong with no indication of quitting at ~850 RPM
  • Able to achieve 2850-2900 RPM static on the ground (prince prop)
  • Engine quits at full power when the mixture is pulled out, continues to run with mixture full out when at idle (expected response)
  • No hesitation from idle to WOT with moderately fast throttle advance
  • Some hesitation when slammed from idle to WOT (however this is documented and expected as there is no accelerator in the TBI)
  • Ridiculously rich. Stupidly rich. Insanely rich. At WOT, I was pulling ~18 gph (with trends that look like it was still increasing at the point where i had to pull back for CHT’s), with equally absurd values at mid throttle settings. Idiotically rich fuel burn rates validated through back smokey exhaust, and an independent fuel flow calibration test where i validated the fuel flow transmitter to be within at least 10% of reality.
  • ~2-3 GPH burn rate at idle
  • Never once quit on me or made me think it was going to quit (unless i was purposely trying to make it quit)

With hindsight being 20/20 - I should have never attempted the flight with fuel flow being that high - that does not make sense. I feel dumb, but hey - I am sharing this so that maybe someone else can learn from it and not repeat the same mistake. The attempted flight went like this: 3-5 second advance to full power, expected response, I noted seeing ~2900 RPM or so with all engine parameters in the green, and then it spontaneously quit somewhere north of 40 MPH IAS.

When I pulled the mixture knob out at WOT, burn rate would diminish slightly.. but it was still much to high (13 GPH) or so before it would become very rough and quit. My thinking in attempting the flight, which was tempered by the frustration of not being able to do anything more than a 10-15 second WOT ground run before reaching CHT limits, was that “so what” if it was running way to rich.. it was running and seemed smooth. Getting to altitude would both keep the engine cool and be more representative of the actual operational condition - and i could feel out the mixture setting there. Didn’t work out that way.

After the attempted flight, my initial thought was that I was over-carburated for my engine. There are notes on Rotec’s website about setting the throttle stop something short of WOT being a normal thing some people have to do. In another engine run done after the fact, I was able to achieve 2900 RPM at 3/4 throttle, opening the throttle even more REDUCED the RPM by ~50-100 or so. So then i re-adjusted my hard stop to that 3/4 position.. but the fuel flow was still 17~18 GPH! Subsequently, I have asked some other people and they have confirmed that they do not reduce the throttle stop at all for their installations on a 3300. I should note that I am running a TBI-40-S (40 mm throat, the recommended model per Rotec for the 3300). Is anyone running the smaller (34" mm) TBI on a 3300?

I would be very curious in hearing from anyone with a TBI on a 3300 the following data points which might help me diagnose if there is something wrong with my TBI or not:

  • What size throat are you running?
  • What static RPM do you get / with what prop?
  • What is your fuel burn rate at WOT and at cruise?
  • Do you restrict the throttle to something less than full capability?
  • What range of the mixture adjustment do you use?

Any other advice or insights would be welcome!

Right now i have an email out to Rotec.. no response yet but it has only been 2 days. Right now my thought is that there is something wrong with my unit. In the troubleshooting section of the website it states that regulator spring length / size and leaky teflon seals are worth checking for overly rich conditions.. i have yet to do those steps but they are probably next on my list.

Below is a bunch of photos from my setup, as well as an excerpt of the data from the ground run series that i did. The chart here is the response when i was limiting myself to 3/4 throttle.

Thanks!


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 8:20 pm

by fastj22

I’ve got about 10 hours on my Rotec TBI now.

I think your idle mix is way too rich. Its unrelated to the mixture adjustment of the spray bar. Its probably dumping extra fuel in.
Mine came a bit too lean and I couldn’t keep it idling. ½ turn rich on the idle adjustment fixed that. Perhaps a bit too rich as I have to lean aggressively on takeoff.

Prince P-tip.
I set mixture about ½ way for takeoff. Anything richer and it runs like crap.
I see 2800 static at runup.
10 GPH on climb out at WOT with EGTs in the 1200s (much more than I saw with the Aerocarb)
I see 5 and 6 going a bit lean at WOT and pulling back throttle a bit brings them even with the others. (over carbing?)
In cruise, I’m seeing around 6GPH with EGTs in the 1300s and RPM at 2800. (about the same as the Aerocarb)
WOT at cruise I will see 3100 RPM (never saw that with the Aerocarb).
I had intended to install a boost fuel pump, but decided to try with just the gravity feed. Its working fine with gravity only.

I did use an air straightner that Tony used. It won’t effect your high fuel use, but will make your EGTs much more even.
https://picasaweb.google.com/tonyboytoo … 7823613170

Overall, I’m pleased with it. EGTs are very even. Throttle and mixture are silky smooth. And I’ve seemed to have gained 200 RPM on climb.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:02 pm

by SonexN76ET

The Rotec TBI documentation needs to be more thorough in my opinion.

Here are three things that are not clearly spelled out by Rotec that could be affecting your installation:

  1. your engine quitting may be due to you advancing the throttle rapidly on takeoff. It takes a second or two for the fuel to run past the fuel pressure regulator to the spray bar after a quick application of power leaving you without fuel in the spray bar for an instant or two, but sometimes long enough for the engine to quit. This can be prevented by moving the location of where your throttle arm connects with the throttle cable causing you to have to make a longer throttle throw, thus slowing down the speed the throttle opens on the Rotec. Think in terms of gears. I am using a Vans Aircraft RV8 throttle and had to move where my throttle cable connects to a point closer than stock to the pivot point on the throttle arm. Another option is to tell yourself to throttle slowly but what if you forget or you loan your plane to another pilot?

  2. you have to put hard stops on your mixture lever that limit the normal range of operation. These are NOT the same as the stops on the body of the Rotec at the mixture arm. My engine will hardly run at full throttle if I go to full rich according to the body stops on the Rotec. My hard stop for full rich is about 1/2 to 2/3rds of full rich. All the Rotec doucumentation says is “your full rich will certainly be less than the full rich position”. This took a lot of trial and error to find the correct range.

  3. like John suggested, you need to check your idle mixture separately. It seems as if you are too rich there. Also, look into an air straightener.

Two other things, if your solenoid deploys by accident depressing the primer when you are at full throttle your engine will quit then too. Second, I am concerned about your throttle cable being at an angle to the throttle slide arm on the TBI. Please consider it being in perfect line with the movement of the throttle slide. Sometimes the Rotec throttle gets very stiff and I distorted my cable and it became worthless and had to get a new cable. Also, make sure the cable can not come out of its keeper on the mount you fabricated on the TBI. On the previous page you can see an example of my mount.

On a closing note, it could also be that you just have a defective unit and need to get it replaced.

Please be careful with the Rotec until you get it all figured out.

Jake


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:32 pm

by WaiexN143NM

Hi Nick,
Sorry to hear you are having some issues with your Rotec TBI . I know u are anxious to get flying again. I was one that highly recommended the Rotec TBI. We love ours. Thanks to John ( I highly encouraged john to get one) and to Jake for input and spot on suggestions. Good eye Jake, I went and looked back at Nick’s pics. First nick u have the right Tbi. The 40-S (spigot mount) . We have a jab 3300 w prince prop. We get 3000 static WOT on the ground . The flows are just like john’s. A couple of things about the pics. First , as jake said , straighten the throttle cable with a longer bracket or rubber adell clamp. Also we drilled 2 holes and safetied wired so the throttle arm cannot come out of the slot. Also the nylon nut holding the clamp u used a longer bolt when u mounted on a/c right? . We have the mark one version , but on the regulator primer we installed a mechanical arm with a cable to the cockpit. Any chance the solenoid u installed is activating and causing extra rich mixture? I suggested to john to try gravity feed only as we have ours. We have never run the tank below approx 5 gal. Below that is there enough head pressure? Don’t know. I posted once to Jake , he was worried about head pressure, also vapor lock. We fly ours in Tucson heat , never had a problem. I believe he also ran a return line to the tank with a electric pump(facet?) hang in there don’t get discouraged. You’ll get it solved. Also not nitpicking anything. I know u work at Scaled and your plane is impeccable. You could teach us all a thing or two. Looking forward to seeing u on the flight line and flying your ‘green’ machine.
WaiexN143NM
Michael Radtke


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:49 pm

by WaiexN143NM

Also , one more thing Nick, I ordered from aircraft spruce a stainless flow grid, about $100, is for the Ellison TBI , but is sized the same for the Rotec. The carb heat box they also sell for the Ellison was way to big, but used it as a guide to build a smaller one, and sent it back. Carb heat box on a tbi is a whole nother thread. The flow grid keeps the cht/ egt’s even.

WaiexN143NM
Michael Radtke


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:30 am

by 142YX

Hey John, Jake & Michael, Thanks for the replies - all good pointers and much appreciated feedback.

  • I will double check the idle mixture setting. Right now i believe it is about 7/8 ths of a turn from fully shut (most lean). Initially i thought i had it dialed in to give a really consistent smooth setting at ~850RPM or so, but worth revisiting. Maybe opening up the low end throttle stop, then leaning it out a bit?
  • I hear ya on the rapid throttle advance.. and i did see hesitation in my static runs when i SLAMMED the throttle forward - but any reasonable throttle advance was met with a very smooth throttle response. I am certain that the throttle advance I gave on the takeoff attempt was at a lower rate than i gave it during the static runs. Below is the data from the takeoff run - it shows that the engine got to at least 2800 RPM over a ~8 second slow advance. I remember looking down and noting that everything was in the green, then looking back up to see the prop abruptly stop. Shows the fuel burn north of 12 GPH but with an upward trend that looks like it wasn’t about to stop.
  • On the takeoff attempt as well as the static runs (shown in the chart above) my mixture was somewhere between 1/2 and 2/3 rds or so.. but still pulling all that fuel. When i tried to lean it out i could get it down to about 12-13 GPH before it started running really rough. Hard to tell though.. as stated previously i can only get about 10-15 seconds of full power static testing in every 20-30 minutes or so before CHTs become a problem.
  • No chance the solenoid was pushing the regulator override button unintentionally.. it is sized so that there is a 1/16" or so gap whenever the solenoid is not energized
  • Agree that the angle of the throttle cable looks a little silly, however i got cornered into this setup when by committing to mounting the TBI vertically. It must be that close to the side of the throttle body in order to sneak by the right hand distributer cap on the back side of the Jabiru. If the cable were parallel to the side of the TBI, it would be colliding with that distributer cap. The push-pul cable claimed to be rated to 15 degrees of angular offset at the point of that swivel however, and i am using less angle than that. The slide on my TBI is smooth and there is no issue that i am aware of with the slide operation. The push pull cable is locked from falling out of its groove by the adel clamp. Michael - good eye on that bolt length, but it is actually an optical illusion because the nut is not tight in that photo. There are two or three threads showing here in the final install. Not trying to be defensive here.. just trying to explain the process i went through to end up with that. But as far as that slide operation, i trust it, even with the silly looking angle in the cable.
  • I originally flew # 142 on gravity feed with the aero carb, and was having vapor issues (burps) in the Mojave heat - which was really the deciding factor for me to go to a pressurized fuel system, and the TBI. With that setup, a fuel flow test yielded only about 11 or 12 GPH flow rate for the last 5 gallons, which was not enough to convince me as it did not meet he 1.5x burn rate thumb rule. I did have the fuel flow transmitter in the line which added some restriction however, and never tested how much better it could have been if i was willing to give up that instrumentation.
  • Good call on the flow grid/straightener - i just put one on order from spruce.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:43 am

by Bryan Cotton

I am curious about the flow straightener. Does it only bring goodness to a Rotec on a Jabiru? Or only on a Rotec?


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:23 am

by lpaaruule

Wow, scary. I don’t have experience with the MKII, but on the MKI that I helped my friend tune, we were never able to get that high of fuel flow unless the primer was pressed. We had the opposite issue, it was too lean at WOT; even with the idle mixture set way rich. Even after enlarging the holes on the spray bar, the fuel max’d out at approx 10gph.

It seems like a regulator issue. What doesn’t make sense though is you said you leaned to around 13gph and the engine ran very rough and quit.

I’m also suspicious of the primer solenoid. If it’s somehow activating intermittently, that could explain the cutout on the takeoff roll.

According to your RPM data, it looks like you advanced the throttle fairly slowly, so that’s probably not the issue.

Sorry all I have is speculation, but it sure seems like a defective unit. I’m very interested in hearing what Rotec says about this.

Good Luck


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:09 am

by fastj22

Bryan Cotton wrote:I am curious about the flow straightener. Does it only bring goodness to a Rotec on a Jabiru? Or only on a Rotec?

I think it would benefit all aero carb motors too.
Just read that VW is going to install them on their cheater diesels to get them to run more efficiently.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:10 am

by fastj22

I’m suspecting a faulty pressure regulator now.

Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:16 am

by 142YX

I’ll double check that my primer solenoid hasn’t somehow become mechanically jammed.. but there is no way that the solenoid was getting power during those runs. Secondary indications like current draw reported from the VPX confirm it. GoPro in the cockpit confirms that at least for the takeoff attempt which was recorded, the primer switch is in the down position. Also, every time the engine shut down, fuel pressure held (and even increased because of heat soak back) which tells me the primer wasn’t depressed and the regulator seal o-ring is still intact (and also the check valves in the engine driven pump are holding well).

But next on my list is to do a teardown and check that the regulator spring is the correct one / right length. It is listed on Rotec’s website as a troubleshooting step for being too rich. Agree that a somehow faulty regulator is one of my leading theories to all of this.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:26 pm

by fastj22

It does sound like the regulator is not regulating properly. Not sure how you test it though.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2015 3:36 pm

by 142YX

I came back to check on the airplane mid this week, and found a 1-drip-per-second fuel leak coming out of the bottom of the TBI. I had left the fuel shutoff valve open, but i have done that in the past with the TBI and it had never leaked on me before. Another data point.

The more I thought about it (whilst still waiting for a response from Rotec) the more I convinced myself that one of two things could have been the problem:

  1. A problem with the regulator, over regulating, but still being intact as pressure would hold with the engine shutdown, etc and it didn’t leak for at least the several hours i was observing the airplane after last use last weekend. Probably on the hairy edge.. because at LOW pressure after some time, the leak developed. My theory was a bad spring, or the wrong spring. But the seals in the regulator must have been good or it wouldn’t have held pressure! -OR-
  2. Bad seals downstream of the regulator.. the teflon seals in the TBI housing or slide body around the metering tube.

I pulled the TBI apart today looking for smoking guns.. here is what I found.

No visible issues with the regulator assembly

Diaphragm was intact and looked to be in good shape. I noted that it looked stretched out a little bit.. but not so excessively that i suspected any problem there. All of the seals / o-rings were in good shape and held pressure.

The spring measured 14.5 mm, uncompressed

Wire diameter on the spring.. 0.33 mm

All of the metering tube seals within the slide assembly were in great shape. I tested them with ~10psi air pressure and they were all impressively tight.
This was the first time i pulled open the slide assembly on my TBI. I found that all of the throttle slide stiction (at least from mine, which was not that bad) came from excess loctite 515 that hand run down into the sides / on the slide itself. I really wish an assembly like this was not put together with glue.

So the only thing that was of any note was the spring. Rotec’s website (which is down today, 12/6/2015, for some reason - but links provided below for if it ever comes back up, i hope) state that an under-lengthend spring can be the cause of both an overly rich running engine, and a source of leaks when shutdown. I think this makes sense. The second link goes on to describe that the spring should be 15mm - 17mm in length, and can be stretched out or cut to get it to the proper length.

http://www.rotecaerosport.com/faqs/tbi-rich/
http://www.rotecaerosport.com/faqs/tbi-regulator-flow-valve-spring/

So there is one documented discrepancy, my spring is 0.5mm too short, per Rotec’s specification. I suppose i should be happy that i found something - but this wasn’t a home run for me. That spring is so tiny and dainty - i can’t see how .5mm (or even 2.5mm) of additional length are going to make the problem of 2x expected fuel flow to go away. Also.. the spring is a pain in the neck to install into its little retention boss within the regulator body.. these things make me question if it is the right spring at all. My gut tells me it is too weak of a spring overall.

Can anyone confirm that? Does the spring in your TBI look that tiny and fragile?

I have a second email out to Rotec now with that question. Waiting patiently for their response.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2015 9:28 pm

by SonexN76ET

Nick,

The only people who seem to return emails at Rotec are Andrea and Paul Chernikov, it seems to be hit or miss with the others. On some subjects they did not choose to return my emails. For instance I sent three emails to ask them if they knew of an electric carb heat system that was compatible with their TBI. This was at the time when they had stated on their website to use electric carb heat or heat muff carb heat. I don’t know why they chose not to respond. I also received conflicting information on the subject of a very stiff slide. I had mentioned in my earlier post that I had destroyed a throttle cable due to the excessively stiff slide. It turned out I had some metal to metal contact on the slide arm and TBI body due to the milling being slightly off. A little work with some scotchbrite took care of the problem. Not meaning to ramble, but you will need to be assertive to get some answers from Rotec.

I have not removed the spring you have in question.

There are two things I would like to share that I found out recently that may help you in your trouble shooting:

  1. if you have your idle mixture too rich, your left side cylinders will run much richer than your right side. This is due to the idle jet being over on the left side of the TBI if aligned with the slide running fore and aft to the direction of flight. On my Aerovee it is a difference of over 120 degrees in EGT.

  2. on my last two flights (including one this evening) when attempting to do touch and goes when I advanced the throttle to full power for takeoff I lost all power and had to pull the throttle to idle and abort the takeoff. Not fun!!! The engine did not stall and did not surge or hesitate. I advanced the throttle very slowly. It seemed to happen after I was airborne and as I was passing 3/4 throttle. I am trying to figure out how to correct this. I am considering restricting the throttle full open position to see if that fixes it. Today’s flight I tried a richer idle mixture setting and that did not solve the problem so I will be leaning my idle mixture a bit to get more balanced EGTs once again. I have cold air induction and will also try touch and goes with alternate air selected to see if that helps perhaps by eliminating rapidly changing air pressure at the same time of increasing throttle.

Please keep us posted on your findings. Most of all be safe!

Jake


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 8:48 am

by lpaaruule

Hi Jake,

Do yo know what your fuel flow is at full throttle?

My friend’s rich idle mixture setting couldn’t supply enough fuel at full throttle. As I’ve mentioned before, we ended up enlarging some of the holes on the spray bar. It fixed the problem, and he no longer had to restrict his throttle, or advance as slowly. For the Jabiru 3300 he went from 6gph to 10gph after the modification at WOT.

Your issue sounds similar.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 2:26 pm

by WaiexN143NM

Hi Nick,
Interesting reading , please keep updating on your trouble shooting. John gillis and myself running gravity feed only on our jab 3300 w rotec carb waiex’s. No trouble with ours. Nick and jake, are u running a pressure (facet pump) inline? We set our slide to be fully open at a WOT. Ground static is 3000RPM, a little more in the air. I believe the VW carb install is horizontal, the jab is installed vertical. Not sure if that makes any difference on anything. Paul told us at Oshkosh that you don’t have to shut off the fuel valve like the aerocarb after shutdown , but that is not true, it will drip ! , not as much but still drips. The spring is small in the regulator. Stretch it 2.5 mm to the max of 17 . Also how are u venting your tank? We originally had a small length tube coming up vertically and bent into slip stream. Changed before first flight to a brake line picked up at Kragen/O’Rielly Auto to go down to bottom of cowl , and bent into slip stream. Small relief hole on back side in case bug etc were to hit and plug up opening. We didn’t want any fuel misting out of vent to get on the lexan windscreen. Nick have you checked your vent tube ? Your plane sat for awhile awaiting your rotec, did u have your vent capped? Make sure no bugs tried to build a home. Anybody else have some ideas??
WaiexN143NM


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 4:06 pm

by 142YX

WaiexN143NM wrote:Hi Nick,
Interesting reading , please keep updating on your trouble shooting.

You bet. Andrea from Rotec got back to me last night and told me they had a busy week, and that Paul is getting to the technical emails (which have backed up a bit) very soon. I very much appreciated this email letting me know what was going on. Ill post here with Rotec’s answer as soon as I receive it.

I noticed that Rotec’s website just changed to a new format.. and those links that go to the lean/rich, and regulator spring troubleshooting sections no longer work. Lucky me that i just came across them the day before they went down.

WaiexN143NM wrote:Hi Nick,
John gillis and myself running gravity feed only on our jab 3300 w rotec carb waiex’s. No trouble with ours. Nick and jake, are u running a pressure (facet pump) inline?

I have the Jabiru stock mechanical fuel pump back on the engine, as well as a Facet pump (upstream of the mechanical pump) on there as a backup. I wanted to use gravity feed a not to violate the K.I.S.S. rule.. but as stated previously I could only get 11~12 GPH (out of the last 5 gal of usable fuel in the tank) fuel flow rate out of my old gravity feed system and that didn’t give me the 1.5x margin on the engine’s requirements that I wanted to sleep at night. I could have improved that a little bit by chucking the fuel flow transducer (never quantified how much that would have improved things), but.. well.. I like toys and wasn’t willing to do that. I like the situational awareness of having fuel flow indication gives you. I did a fuel flow test of the current system the way I have it now (with fuel even flowing through the gallery in the TBI to be as realistic as possible), and the results were: ZERO FLOW with the pump off (head pressure from the Sonex tank was not enough to get past the check valves in the engine driven pump), and ~26 GPH with the facet pump on. No way to test just the engine driven pump, however. Both pumps put out about 4.5 - 5 psi.

WaiexN143NM wrote:Hi Nick,
We set our slide to be fully open at a WOT. Ground static is 3000RPM, a little more in the air. I believe the VW carb install is horizontal, the jab is installed vertical.
WaiexN143NM

Good data point. That’s what I was hoping for in my setup as well. Other people that i have talked to have confirmed that they don’t restrict their throttle opening on a 3300 as well. My TBI is mounted vertically (throttle slides downward to open).

WaiexN143NM wrote:Hi Nick,
The spring is small in the regulator. Stretch it 2.5 mm to the max of 17.
WaiexN143NM

Crap. I was hoping you didn’t say that! I was hoping for a real smoking gun being that I had the wrong spring or something, aside from just being a tiny amount out of spec by length. I want to wait for Rotec’s official response before I stretch out the spring.. but I will likely try this soon. If this is really the case.. it bothers me that that spring is so sensitive and critical to the unit’s functionality. IMHO, If it really needs to be that sensitive, the design should have an adjustment (setscrew) that can adjust the spring’s pre-load, like any other sophisticated metering device with a regulator. The setscrew would function like a high-end adjustment. Come to think of it, this could be a design improvement. Maybe I’ll build my own carb! :lol:

WaiexN143NM wrote:Hi Nick,
Also how are u venting your tank? We originally had a small length tube coming up vertically and bent into slip stream. Changed before first flight to a brake line picked up at Kragen/O’Rielly Auto to go down to bottom of cowl , and bent into slip stream. Small relief hole on back side in case bug etc were to hit and plug up opening. We didn’t want any fuel misting out of vent to get on the lexan windscreen. Nick have you checked your vent tube ? Your plane sat for awhile awaiting your rotec, did u have your vent capped? Make sure no bugs tried to build a home.
WaiexN143NM

I have the same vent tube setup as you describe on yours. I’ll check for a clog.. but my thinking is that this would only contribute to a lean running engine, not rich?


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 4:13 pm

by 142YX

SonexN76ET wrote:1) if you have your idle mixture too rich, your left side cylinders will run much richer than your right side. This is due to the idle jet being over on the left side of the TBI if aligned with the slide running fore and aft to the direction of flight. On my Aerovee it is a difference of over 120 degrees in EGT.

I’ll check that.. currently my idle adjustment was set at the high end of Rotec’s recommendation. They say “somewhere between .5 and 1 turn from full shut.. no more than 1.5 turns open”. Mine was set at 1.5 TFFS during all of this. I think I’ll play with that again as i would rather be in the middle of the range somewhere.. but i haven’t gotten a chance to note EGT’s that are real yet as i haven’t gotten in the air.

SonexN76ET wrote:2) on my last two flights (including one this evening) when attempting to do touch and goes when I advanced the throttle to full power for takeoff I lost all power and had to pull the throttle to idle and abort the takeoff. Not fun!!! The engine did not stall and did not surge or hesitate. I advanced the throttle very slowly. It seemed to happen after I was airborne and as I was passing 3/4 throttle. I am trying to figure out how to correct this. I am considering restricting the throttle full open position to see if that fixes it. Today’s flight I tried a richer idle mixture setting and that did not solve the problem so I will be leaning my idle mixture a bit to get more balanced EGTs once again. I have cold air induction and will also try touch and goes with alternate air selected to see if that helps perhaps by eliminating rapidly changing air pressure at the same time of increasing throttle.

Interesting. That sounds a bit like what happened to me on the ground a few times, but it would only happen when i absolutely slammed the throttle wide open from idle. Anything at a realistic rate of what i think i would do in flight produced no hesitation.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 8:58 pm

by fastj22

Just put another 2 hours on mine. I recently recalibrated my fuel system and found I was getting 25 GPH through the fuel feed disconnected from the carb.
Reconnected everything.
Took it out and it ran very well. Was seeing around 6GPH in cruise at 2700 RPM. Bumped to 8GPH at 3000. I have never seen over 3000 with my Aerocarb, but I’m seeing 3100 with the Rotec if I really push it.
EGTs were very even, something I never saw with the Aerocarb (but I do have an air straightener on this).

If you are seeing a more than 10 GPH at WOT, something is wrong and I’d bet its that voodoo regulator.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 4:51 pm

by 142YX

fastj22 wrote:I set mixture about ½ way for takeoff. Anything richer and it runs like crap.

John, Can you confirm your full rich position is at the full rich of the TBI’s capability? (so when you say 1/2 mixture.. you mean 1/2 on the TBI itself?) If not.. where (approximately) do you set your full rich cockpit stop relative to the TBI’s stop?

fastj22 wrote:10 GPH on climb out at WOT with EGTs in the 1200s (much more than I saw with the Aerocarb)
I see 5 and 6 going a bit lean at WOT and pulling back throttle a bit brings them even with the others. (over carbing?)

fastj22 wrote:I had intended to install a boost fuel pump, but decided to try with just the gravity feed. Its working fine with gravity only.

fastj22 wrote:Just put another 2 hours on mine. I recently recalibrated my fuel system and found I was getting 25 GPH through the fuel feed disconnected from the carb.

You get 25 GPH fuel flow with your gravity feed system and no pumps (the engine driven pump is not installed in your setup also.. correct?)??! Very impressive. You quoted some in-flight fuel flow numbers.. do you have a fuel flow transducer? what kind? Was it in the flow path for your hanger calibration? If i could have gotten those kinds of flows, i never would have installed the pumps. Although, per Rotec, it shouldn’t make a difference…

I must say i am jealous.. the performance you are getting is absolutely what i was hoping for!

Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:42 pm

by fastj22

142YX wrote:

fastj22 wrote:I set mixture about ½ way for takeoff. Anything richer and it runs like crap.

John, Can you confirm your full rich position is at the full rich of the TBI’s capability? (so when you say 1/2 mixture.. you mean 1/2 on the TBI itself?) If not.. where (approximately) do you set your full rich cockpit stop relative to the TBI’s stop?

fastj22 wrote:10 GPH on climb out at WOT with EGTs in the 1200s (much more than I saw with the Aerocarb)
I see 5 and 6 going a bit lean at WOT and pulling back throttle a bit brings them even with the others. (over carbing?)
fastj22 wrote:I had intended to install a boost fuel pump, but decided to try with just the gravity feed. Its working fine with gravity only.
fastj22 wrote:Just put another 2 hours on mine. I recently recalibrated my fuel system and found I was getting 25 GPH through the fuel feed disconnected from the carb.

You get 25 GPH fuel flow with your gravity feed system and no pumps (the engine driven pump is not installed in your setup also.. correct?)??! Very impressive. You quoted some in-flight fuel flow numbers.. do you have a fuel flow transducer? what kind? Was it in the flow path for your hanger calibration? If i could have gotten those kinds of flows, i never would have installed the pumps. Although, per Rotec, it shouldn’t make a difference…

I must say i am jealous.. the performance you are getting is absolutely what i was hoping for!

I did not limit my mixture control per the Rotec instructions. It swings the mixture lever of the Rotec the full arc. So when I say I’m at half mixture, the arm is mid way in the throw. If I go full rich, meaning the spray bar is turned to maximum fuel sucking, the engine runs like crap, too rich. Leaning it for takeoff required I pull it mid range. This took some trial and error to figure out where the best setting was for takeoff. I’m also at 7000ft MSL so your results will vary.

on the disconnected flow, I have a Red Cube transducer. when I disconnect the fuel line from the carb and hang it into a gas can and open the valve, I see 25 GPH, that is through the gascolator, no boost, full tank. I verified it with the EFIS and just by timing it. It does drop a bit near the end of the tank, but always over 20 GPH. All my lines and fittings are AN6.

Still think you have a dodgy regulator.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 3:22 pm

by SonexN76ET

Here is a video of my Rotec TBI cutting out while accelerating during an attempted touch and go. You can hear the engine cutting out shortly after I start accelerating. The plane had already begun to lift off. After it cuts out, I pull the throttle back and abort the touch and go. This was on a day with gusty winds and a 9 knot crosswind.

I do not have a fuel flow transducer so I do not know the fuel flow at this time. In a subsequent attempt, I had richened the idle mixture but had the same result. It has not yet occurred during a regular takeoff roll, only during touch and go attempts. I believe this is due to one of three things:

  1. Too much ram air too fast while accelerating
  2. Too lean of mixture at the spraybar (mixture lever leaned too far)
  3. Over carburation where the throttle slide needs to be restricted

My next step will be to restrict the incoming ram air.

I have not been able to replicate this with ground runs.

Before my next flight I may slightly retard the throttle slide and try a slightly richer mixture on the mixture lever for the spray bar.

I only share this so others can learn from my experiences. I am not slamming any product or company.

Thanks,

Jake

https://youtu.be/G45AEPfAwQU


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:32 am

by 142YX

Thanks for posting that video, Jake. Below is the video of my failed takeoff attempt (sorry the audio from my mic is so bad).

In your video, it sounds like you get up to a high RPM and the engine dwells there pretty happy for a few seconds before it just abruptly quits. Was there any adjustment made at all to either throttle or mixture after you got to top RPM? Very similar to what happened to me.. a few seconds at 2800 RPM with no inputs made whatsoever, then it quits.

https://youtu.be/TLcTzYc9-iM

Rotec got back to me with some basic troubleshooting steps:

Hi Nick sorry for the late reply, this time of year here is extremely hectic!

The first test I would do would be to make sure the TBI metering regulator is not passing fuel when the engine is off.

To do this depress the fuel primer button located in the center of the TBI regulator cover, with the throttle wide open and fuel pump on the fuel should pour out. When you let go the primer button the fuel should stop, may be a few drips here and there but should stop fairly quickly.

If after you let go the primmer button fuel continues to flow liberally then the regulator is not shutting off and may need attention.

I can send you out a refined flow valve we have been working on.

Also to get a nice clean idle you may need to adjust the small Allen screw located on the side of the TBI, this set the idle mixture only.

Also air inlet is extremely important, a good base line would be to ground run the engine with the filter and or ducts disconnected. Just for a quick test.

The reg spring length wont matter.

I didn’t suspect any problem with the regulator (as far as it’s ability to seal, because pressure held when the engine was not running) but i re-performed this test anyway. The primer button did function as expected - flowing liberally when depressed and stopping immediately when released. I noted that the carb leaks (drips) at a slow rate with the boost pump on now.. didn’t do that before that i remember or noticed. I sent another email back to Rotec and got the following response:

I would advise you send the TBI back to us and lets take a look and see why its so rich.

I suspect it’s a metering problem.

We will take care of it.

Please print a copy of this email and include it with the TBI.

I appreciate the support from Rotec.. just seems like they are very busy. I fear that i won’t fly again before the end of the year, at least, though. :cry:

Then i tried another engine run, this time with the idle adjust set back at the factory position. The engine started right up, and i noticed 4~6 is GPH at 1200 RPM.. which sounds wrong yet again. When i brought the throttle back to idle it quit (to be expected because i was trying to reset the idle setting).. but then i could not get the engine to light up over the nest 45 minutes worth of trying. It’s possible i flooded it.. but that has never happened before. Killed the battery pretty good so i had to stop for a charge. Going to try to get it running one more time.. and then i will likely be sending it back to Rotec.

This is a picture of my metering tube. Does this look right to other people with 40mm bore TBI’s? The holes point out (into the incoming airstream) when full lean. As best i can tell from other photos i find on the internet.. this is the correct orientation for a Rotec TBI (but opposite compared to the old Ellison patent) but i am getting pretty desperate to figure out what is gong on here so i figured i would ask. Also, do the holes look like the same pattern as everyone else? (i don’t have a larger model meter tube in mine)?


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:02 am

by fastj22

Yes, orientation and pattern look identical to mine.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:52 pm

by SonexN76ET

Nick,

On my video of the Rotec TBI when the engine cuts out it is after it has achieved full power for a few seconds. I did not make any throttle changes or mixture changes. I am thinking that my induction system is the cause. I am in the process of redoing the air intake plumbing.

By the way, it looks like Rotec has updated their website with enhanced documentation.

Your video seems to show a result very similar to what I encountered. Not fun!

It will be interesting to find out what is causing your metering issue.

Be safe with your testing!

Jake


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 2:39 am

by WaiexN143NM

Hi Nick and Jake,
Hope u guys get it figured out soon. John Gillis and myself have had good luck with our Rotec TBI. In fact I recommended to john to get one. We are using gravity feed , no gascolactor, red cube fuel flow inline. Carb heat box with flow straightner, and a filter much larger than the stock sonex one.

Off topic, Avery tools is closing. Always enjoyed seeing Bob and Judy at Oshkosh at their booth. Visit their web site before Dec 15 if u need something. WWW.Averytools.com

Great cowling fasteners are available from WWW.Skybolt.com. Not cheap but stainless and great quality.

Happy Holidays to the Sonex Family.

WaiexN143NM
Michael Radtke


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:54 am

by WaiexN143NM

Hi all,
One correction to previous post, pls change we to I , as I describe my Tbi set up.

Nick , don’t forget when priming, to fully open the throttle, to fully expose the spray bar. If u don’t then priming won’t occur.

WaiexN143NM


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 10:51 pm

by onex28

I need to find a 90 degree female 1/4 NPT to 6AN male for a fuel line connection, preferably AL. So far the only thing I’ve found is a metal male 1/4NPT to female 1/4 NPT swivel hydraulic hose adapter, (internal pipe swivel adapter) which I could use. It has a 5000 PSI rating. Anyone have a source for an Al fitting? Just assuming that a hydraulic fitting would also work on a fuel line. Am I wrong?

David W


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 11:31 pm

by fastj22

onex28 wrote:I need to find a 90 degree female 1/4 NPT to 6AN male for a fuel line connection, preferably AL. So far the only thing I’ve found is a metal male 1/4NPT to female 1/4 NPT swivel hydraulic hose adapter, (internal pipe swivel adapter) which I could use. It has a 5000 PSI rating. Anyone have a source for an Al fitting? Just assuming that a hydraulic fitting would also work on a fuel line. Am I wrong?

David W

Have you checked performance racing or Jeggs? They have most AN fittings you might need.


Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 2:36 pm

by onex28

Hi John

I think I’ve exhausted all the sources on the Internet and it looks like my remaining choice is an Eaton Aeroquip 1/4 NPT street elbow and adapt from that. I found several 6an to NPT elbows but they were the wrong sex. I also discovered that NPT and NPSM are not compatible unless you use an O ring in the NPSM.

Didn’t find what I wanted but I leaned something so no loss.

David W

Re: Rotec MKII TBI

Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 10:12 pm

by fastj22

Ok, how about a straight NPT to AN6, and then an AN6 to AN6 elbow? Lots of ways to skin a cat.