Camguard

Camguard

Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2020 10:37 am

by GraemeSmith

Anyone running Camguard in the Valvoline VR1 20/50 oil?

As winter makes it harder to fly consistently and maintain oil films - I’d like to improve my chances while sitting. I KNOW it works well in Mineral Oil base stock in Aviation oils. But not sure if the chemistry in the Camguard will conflict with the chemistry in the Valvoline…


Re: Camguard

Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2020 10:52 pm

by Rynoth

Interesting.. I wasn’t aware of this product. I do wonder if it could possibly help with my turbo getting sticky after a few weeks on the ground.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2020 1:51 am

by pilotyoung

They make Camguard for auto engines and small engines. You might try the Camguard for auto engines.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2020 8:00 am

by GraemeSmith

Hey thanks!

Camguard Automotive wrote:CamGuard Automotive is particularly useful in older engine designs utilizing flat tappet valve trains especially when using modern, mandated lower zinc (phosphorus), oils.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2020 10:25 am

by AlexZ

VR1 is already high zinc
‘Valvoline VR1 Racing Oil’s high zinc formula provides race-level protection for high performance engines on the race track or the highway. Its exclusive chemistry is designed to reduce friction and enhance power.’


Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2020 12:55 pm

by Klimek

Gentlemen,
So as I now understand from reading this thread that Cam Guard is to be used in older flat lifter engines that use a lower zinc formulation. Does this prohibit its use in our AeroVee engines that are using Valvoline VR-1 high zinc oil?
I have, in the past, thought about using Cam Guard because of its high friction surface protection but now I’m rethinking it.
Am I missing anything? Is Cam Guard a high zinc additive that hangs on surfaces long after the engine is shut down?
Onex 090
N1970T


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:04 am

by GraemeSmith

It’s not just about the zinc.

The other principle benefit of CamGuard is helping maintain oil film over an extended period of non-use. That’s what I’m really after.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2020 12:23 am

by lakespookie

I thought they updated the oil recommendations to not include the VR-1 oil and only list the brad penn


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2020 6:28 am

by GraemeSmith

lakespookie wrote:I thought they updated the oil recommendations to not include the VR-1 oil and only list the brad penn

Current manual states:

Valvoline VR1 20/50 non synthetic
Brad-Penn Penn-Grade 1 Racing 20/50

for Break in and Running.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2020 10:16 am

by Rynoth

lakespookie wrote:I thought they updated the oil recommendations to not include the VR-1 oil and only list the brad penn

I believe this was only for the Aerovee Turbo.

Service Bulletin ACV-SB-091616-2A shows more options for stock Aerovee.
http://www.aeroconversions.com/support/aerovee_sb.html

Re: Camguard

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 1:05 pm

by GraemeSmith

I have just had the most fascinating 45 mins on the phone with Ed Kollin - the man who invented CamGuard. Mike Busch at Savvy Aviation tipped me off to him as I had asked about some Camguard applications. Ed started his career in Detroit working for GM, them moved to Exxon Research where he ran their Engine Research/Lubricant testing for 20 years. Then he moved on to Aircraft Specialties Lubricants where they came up with Camguard.

My inquiry was about using it in my current little AeroConversions 2.1 in the Sonex where “Additives are not recommended”. But the discussion was wide ranging and covered Continentals and Lycomings too and I made some notes.

He made the following comment about the Valvoline VR1 and Brad Penn Grade 1 Racing 20w50 oils:

The oils are designed for just that - Racing. They are supposed to run one race and then get drained and replaced. Though they ARE Zinc Rich for our valve trains - they are deficient in a number of chemistries that make them good for time spent in an engine - especially if they get critical hot in a turbo. Among other things mentioned - low on Detergents to keep the contaminants in suspension. He recommended that if using these oils - they are not allowed to sit in the sump any longer than 3 months before they are changed - regardless of time on the oils. His view was that Camguard Automotive (not the aviation version) would make up for deficiencies in the oil chemistry - but he still recommended a 3 month oil change interval if you hadn’t hit 25 hours.

There a number of varieties of Camguard - aimed at:

Aviation (Lycoming / Continental)
Automotive (where the engines are much tighter)
Diesel (where the engines are much dirtier)

But in essence they all contain Anti-wear agents
Differing degrees of detergents (3% / 6% and 9% respectively)
11 other chemistries aimed at specific parts of the engine - including chemicals that are polar to certain contaminants to help keep them in suspension to come out with the oil changes and some to keep older seals more flexible.

All to improve the oil you are already using.

Broadly - if you start using Camguard (having not used it before) in an engine with 500 hours and up you might expect (Based on Lycoming / Continentail where they have a lot of data):

Iron wear in the oil analysis to HALF or better immediately.
All other metals to RISE over the next oil change and then tail off over a total of three oil changes as they are flushed out the nooks and crannies of your engine tailing back to where they were or slightly lower.
Over the next three oil changes expect to find significant carbon in the oil filter or screen as it is worked out the engine - principally from around the piston ring stack.

For turbo versions of our AeroVees - it would be CRITICAL to ensure that displaced carbon does not make it to the turbo bearings and that your filtration is top notch.

As the piston ring stack is loosened and allowed to float better - compressions might come up by as much as 10 points.

BUT- Camguard will not save an engine that is worn out and coming up on TBO!!

Thereafter expect lower rust (iron) from steel cylinders and so lower wear and lower deposits of lead sludge (that gray ‘butter’ substance) inside the engine..

Comments on filters over oil screens:

When Ed talked to Lycoming engineers - they were of the view that allowing the oil change interval to go up to 50 hours when a full flow filter was put in place of an oil screen - was actually BAD for engines. In the sense that for engines not used a lot - the oil would now sit a long time between changes and so deteriorate. Full flow filters (50 microns) tend to have a larger capacity to filter over time than an oil screen (also 50 microns). So the benefit is the ability to catch more “stuff” over a period - not that the filtration is necessarily any better. And as the most destructive wear components are 10 microns in size - they are getting through EITHER 50 micron filter. or screen. So an oil analysis program is a must.

Change aviation oils at 4 months - regardless of the hours on it - after that is starts to deteriorate. That is where Lycoming wished they had been more specific.

So filters are GOOD - but only to allow you to fly up to 50 hours in that 4 month window (on Lycoming of Continental engines). On our little tappet style engines with low internal volumes - sticking to 25 hours is a must to keep valve clearances set and the small volume of oil clean by changing it.

Rotax engines. Camguard is absolutely recommended from Day 1. Engines not using it will start to exhibit vibration associated with internal clutch wear at about 300 hours. With Camguard - this tendency has not been observed.

Lead “Sludge” in an engine is principally the Lead Bromide left over from 100LL combustion combining with varnishes formed in the oil from deterioration. Using TCP - the sludge is Lead Phosphate. The principal benefit of TCP (which he recommends) is to keep the lead metal blobs off the spark plugs. Not keep the lead out the oil. When he has examined lead sludge in virtually every instance he has found it is 1 micron in size which means it is too small to be a wear factor. 1 micron lead deposits on valve guides are NOT what causes morning sickness. It’s other varnish chemistry that builds up that does that.

I mentioned that after I have drained my oil I put a pint of Mineral Spirit in the engine and work it around to get the last of the oil out. He considered this a good practice if done consistently - not just because it would help get the sludge out (my thinking) - but also because it would dissolve varnish deposits that might be forming and so keep the engine cleaner. Beware doing it to an engine that has a lot of hours on it though. You may well dissolve out a lot of sludge and get globs floating around that block fine oil passages. Do it consistently from day one - or be wary of doing it.

Certificated Aero Engines - He volunteered - Phillips xc 20w-50 compared to Aeroshell 15w-50. Chemically and Effectiveness - nothing to choose between the two EXCEPT that the Phillips has a slightly better detergent package.

So the man is out to sell me Camguard - right? Well not to me. He volunteered to supply me with Camguard Automotive free of charge if I would share my oil analysis reports back with him.

Finally - The factory doesn’t recommend additives. And we discussed this extensively. And if the factory would like to chime in here - feel free!

Ed was of the view that Camguard has nothing in it that is harmful to our engines or oil and a lot that is good. That the recommended oils are not bad - but they are not great if left sitting in engines too long and so Camguard could help. Especially for the environment I am worried about - sitting in salty air on the coast.

So AT MY RISK I will try it and report back.

YMMV


Re: Camguard

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 8:48 pm

by kmacht

Graeme - That certainly is an interesting post and I don’t think camguard will necessarily hurt anything but it needs to be looked at in context for this particular engine. Aerovee engines are very simple machines with very wide toldrances and the wear parts on them are very cheap and easy to replace. A new set of pistons and cylinders cost about $150 and a cam around $100. I’m not sure I have heard of any Sonex needing to replace cylinders or cams because they wore out from not using a detergent oil, changing oil every 3 months or not using an additive like camguard. There are also very few places if any in the engine where the sludge you mention can get caught and cause problems. Most oil passages are between an 1/8 and a 1/4 wide at their narrowest points.

As a fellow engineer I realize that it is very easy to get caught up in the theoretical and strive for perfection and lose sight of real world results and conditions. I am interested in seeing your oil analysis results from a purely theoretical engineering perspective but also want to make sure that others on here don’t start worrying about the health of their engines because they haven’t been using camguard or changed their oil ever 90 days.

For one other data point I put around 150 hours on my aerovee powered Sonex before it sat for over a year parked out on the ramp here in the northeast due to some medical issues. I tore the engine down after moving the plane back home and didn’t see any evidence at all of corrosion or wear on any of the internal engine parts. Other than some normal carbon build up on the domes of the cylinder heads and top of the pistons everything looked exactly like it did the day I originally assembled it. I ran valvoline VR-1, no oil filter other than the regular sump screen and did oil changes scheduled according to the manual. To be fair my engine is normally aspirated and my experience may be different than someone with a turbo setup.

Keith
#554


Re: Camguard

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 9:55 pm

by GraemeSmith

Not arguing. Just some thoughts:

  • The tolerances are certainly wide - but they are much tighter engines than Lycomings and Continentals.

  • My concern is really a high humidity salt laden prevailing SW breeze across our ramp and maintaining an oil film to protect if not flown for more than 7 days or so t. Others on the ramp with aforementioned Continentals and Lycomings (especially those Lycomings) can see thin rust films VERY quickly in the cold of winter after shut down.

  • We don’t have a TBO - it’s all on condition. Anything that reduces wear metals in the oil analysis - would speak for hopefully extending life before overhaul. Now our overhauls are potentially relatively cheap - but I’d rather be flying than overhauling.

YMMV


Re: Camguard

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 11:46 pm

by pilotyoung

Just to be sure I understand, he recommends Camguard automotive for the AeroVee engine?


Re: Camguard

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2020 6:06 am

by GraemeSmith

pilotyoung wrote:Just to be sure I understand, he recommends Camguard automotive for the AeroVee engine?

Yes - Automotive - it’s formulated to go in the automotive oil.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2020 7:47 pm

by pilotyoung

Thanks. I am going to start using CamGuard in my AeroVee. I also have a RV-12 and I use Aviation CamGuard in the Rotax engine.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2020 8:27 pm

by GraemeSmith

pilotyoung wrote:Thanks. I am going to start using CamGuard in my AeroVee. I also have a RV-12 and I use Aviation CamGuard in the Rotax engine.

What oil are you using in the Rotax? I thought they specified a non-aviation oil? Correct me if I am wrong.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2020 8:55 pm

by pilotyoung

I use Aero Shell Sport Plus 4. Originally Rotax recommended a motor cycle oil. But then Aero Shell developed this oil especially for the Rotax engines so that is what they recommend now.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2020 10:47 am

by bvolcko38

Graeme,
Great topic. I bought a bottle of Camguard a year ago, but was advised by an A&P not to use it until the engine is well broken in, or else the engine would never properly break in.

Aside from that, I was hoping that you found a better oil to use, an oil that was not made to be dumped after one use (racing oil). Lucas makes a zinc additive that can be added to almost any type of oil, for our Aerovee zinc needs. An automotive or even a diesel oil with zinc additive could be good? The reason zinc is no longer in automotive oil is for the sake of the catalytic converters.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2020 11:20 am

by sonex1374

bvolcko38 wrote:I was hoping that you found a better oil to use, an oil that was not made to be dumped after one use (racing oil).

Bill,

Valvoline VR1 20W50 is branded as a “Racing Oil”, but it probably should be thought of as “High Performance” oil, or maybe “weekend race wannabe but daily driver” oil. It’s not in the same league as a true specialty oil that is used in the big name races. It’s actually perfect for what we want - good protection and longevity with some extra anti-wear additives that help fight heat and friction. It has all the right components for us, and doesn’t really need to be drained after just one “race” (in other words, we can use it for a realistic interval without fear it’s falling apart on us).

My only complaint about it is that it can sometimes be hard to find at the local auto parts store. Shopping around will usually turn up a supplier, or there’s always Amazon (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07ZCQZ771/).

Jeff

Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2020 11:32 am

by Bryan Cotton

I just ordered my first jug of Valvoline VR1 20W50 from Amazon. It is funny how many of the reviews say “this is perfect for my classic VW bug!”


Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2020 5:07 pm

by GraemeSmith

I actually did have a follow up out to Ed along the lines of:

“So what oil would YOU use in the VW Type III engine as we are using it in the aviation environment”

His interesting response was:

Ed Kollin wrote:I would probably use a 15W-40 diesel oil like Shell Rotella

Don’t think I’ll try that yet!

He did say that the Valvoline or Brad-Penn fortified with Camguard - would improve them to a point he would be more comfortable.

To the point about Aero Shell Sport Plus 4 replacing a bike oil in Rotax engines - he was very enthusiastic. He didn’t have much good to say about the previous bike oil!


Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2020 5:10 pm

by bvolcko38

My thoughts exactly. Diesel oil is high in zinc and detergents.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2020 10:45 am

by WesRagle

GraemeSmith wrote:Ed Kollin wrote:
I would probably use a 15W-40 diesel oil like Shell Rotella

Don’t think I’ll try that yet!

Lots of advice when it comes to engine oil :slight_smile:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvN83Xb2xy8

Wes


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2020 12:15 pm

by Rofomoto

Covair uses Rotella 15-40. With ZDDP addictive exclusively. Billy


Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 7:10 pm

by GraemeSmith

First results after 25 hours on Valvoline VR 1 with Automotive CamGuard

ALL metals are down 25%-30% on the oil analysis @ 391 hours TT
Compressions measured at the end of 25 hours on Camguard 78/78/78/78 (From 72/74/78/76 - 25 hours before @ 366 hours)

Disclosure - Ed Kollin of ASEL Camguard is assisting with advice and 4 free samples to be used over the 100 hours.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2021 11:34 am

by BRS

Graeme,
What fuel are you using? As mentioned earlier (about TCP) lead from 100LL likes to settle out of most automotive oils (is that true with the VR1?). I remember running a rotax 914 where lead settling was noticeable. Nice thing for rotax is that the remote oil sump is easy to open up and clean out. In my Lyc (sportsman) I run Phillips XC and 100LL. But in the sonex (still under renovation) I’ve not yet decided what I’ll run in the revmaster. I’m not a fan of ethanol and ‘clear’ is not much cheaper than 100LL.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2021 3:21 am

by GraemeSmith

BRS wrote:Graeme,
What fuel are you using? As mentioned earlier (about TCP) lead from 100LL likes to settle out of most automotive oils (is that true with the VR1?). I remember running a rotax 914 where lead settling was noticeable. Nice thing for rotax is that the remote oil sump is easy to open up and clean out. In my Lyc (sportsman) I run Phillips XC and 100LL. But in the sonex (still under renovation) I’ve not yet decided what I’ll run in the revmaster. I’m not a fan of ethanol and ‘clear’ is not much cheaper than 100LL.

100LL - the only way I can get the octane required around here for the 8:1 compression my builder set up.

I run Decalin TCP in the fuel to try and get as much lead out the exhaust as possible. The plugs are whistle clean at 100 hours when I chuck them anyways as they are cheap enough.

I use mineral based VR1 - not the synthetic based - so it doesn’t tend to sludge in the engine. In fact from past experience. Synthetic and 100LL is a passage killing sludgeathon. Ask Mobil if you were around in the day when they tried it and then paid for a lot of engine rebuilds.

I removed the “in sump” oil screen and have a Petersen High Flow 60 micron filter with cleanable element on the front of the engine below the oil cooler air scoop. The holder has some pretty “thick” goo in it towards 25 hours - but it is not gray sludge yet. I vacuum the hot oil out from the low point of the engine sump where I fitted a quick drain so I don’t have to keep dropping the oil cooler air scoop. A pint of mineral spirit into the empty engine and vacuum that out. Then Button up and refill. So I only drop the sump every 100 hours and it’s clean.

One thing that Ed Kollin mentioned was Camguard’s ability to help get lead sludge out. It doesn’t show in my oil numbers. I suspect the Decalin has been doing it’s job there. So jury still out on that one.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2021 6:51 pm

by GraemeSmith

So just to follow up on another oil report just in, where the metals are down to tiny levels. Blackstone’s summary is:

Blackstone Labs wrote:The last sample looked uncharacteristically good, with most metals reading at some of their lowest levels on the page. That makes for a tough act to follow because metals can’t always read at their lowest levels, otherwise at some point the engine would have to start putting metals back on the parts. So this report looks fine. The wear levels are certainly out of line low compared to what we’ve generally come to expect from this particular engine. No contamination was found. Looks fine from here.

This is in line with Ed Kollins of ASEL’s prediction that after a couple of oil changes with Camguard metals would drop significantly.

Fingers crossed for the next report.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 12:37 pm

by n502pd

Has anyone who has been using VR-1 20/50 non synth oil in their engine encountered sludge build up? And has anyone had any adverse effects of using additive with high zinc with the VR-1, or with the Brad Penn Penn Grade 1 racing oil? Lastly, is the VR-1 oil causing sludge, where the Brad Penn oil dosent, while using 100LL? Thanks for any insight/info!

Joe

Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 1:05 pm

by kmacht

150 hours and sitting on the ramp for over a year without being run and there was zero sludge and zero corrosion when I tore the engine down. Any sludge that might form gets drained right out the sump and screen when you do the 25 hour oil changes. Anything that might get trapped in the head would be very visible each time you adjust the valves and anything inside the case would just get pushed through to the sump as the smallest oil passage is about an 1/8 inch with many of the others much bigger. It’s not going to get trapped in there with 40 psi of pressure flowing oil through the system. The sludge concern is a solution looking for a non existent problem.

Keith
#554


Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 1:46 pm

by n502pd

Thats fine and good to hear! I have run a finger around the interior of the sump a couple of times and have retrieved very thin black smudge on my finger, but nothing ever has shown up on the sump screen, or in the remote oil filter when I cut it open. Rocker boxes were pristeen and nothing but oil in side.

TKS!, Joe


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2021 4:27 pm

by pappas

So, knowing that Sonex doesn’t like oil or fuel additives, and only approves of one oil for the turbo, Brad Penn Racing 20-50, do we think that Camguard automotive would be appropriate for use in the turbo?

I see, and clean off, gray sludge around the sump screen at the oil changes. I have the turbo cooling system and remote oil filter installed on mine. I engage the turbo cooling system at landing and idle for at least 3 minutes prior to shutdown per Sonex recommendations.

I monitor turbo body temps and never see it in the turbo temperature range where oil coking has been seen to occur. I have not had any indications of turbo problems that were described by a few early adaptors. I have 115 hours on mine and live in the SW desert.

Just wondering if I should spend some money on more stuff or leave well enough alone.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2021 9:33 pm

by GraemeSmith

Lou - jump back to my Dec 2020 post about my call with Ed Kollin. Starts:

“I have just had the most fascinating 45…”

He didn’t think the Brad Penn oil was a particularly good oil to use with a turbo. So (and I may not have stated it explicitly in the notes there) - he thought Camguard would make up for missing chemistries and help turbos.

I do have to caution that I’m EXPERIMENTing (well we all are) and my decision to use two additives:

  • Camgard in the oil
  • TCP in the 100LL

do seem to go against AeroConversions advice. I’m doing it at my own risk. The TCP I’m easily comfortable about - been doing it for years with 100LL and had cleaner engines and plugs as a result.

The decision about the oil - I was initially looking for better corrosion protection between runs on this salty east coast - but ended up with quite a discussion about other benefits. I do wonder (and perhaps AeroConversions can chime in) if the recommendation about not using additives is simply they have not had a chance to do long term comparative testing or if they have specific issues they have noticed with additives.

So Camgard is definitely at my own risk.

Different thought - Back in the 1990’s I used to run a marinized Ford diesel that had an early model turbo added. We had to take precautions at shut down to ensure we idled the engine for a good period to let the turbo cool and avoid coking oil on the bearings which would make it seize on the next start. Not dissimilar to the cooling added to turbos on the AeroVee.

We also had very specific oil recommendations from Ford for oils that reduced the chances of coking the bearings. There was also a requirement to pre-oil the bearings and pressure feed them on the first start after an oil change or extended period where the engine had not run and the oil film would have broken down in the turbo. I think Ford probably had a much larger R&D budget to decide which oils were best for the turbo. I’m COMPLETELY GUESSING that a less well resourced AeroConversions have found an oil that works and so recommend just that.

So this is a long winded way of saying - if you want to try it - Buyer Beware, At Your Own Risk, etc etc.(but you know that anyway)


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2021 10:54 pm

by n502pd

Thanks for the insight! I am using TCP also and have no concerns about it. Since I dont have the turbo, I was just thinking ( a dangerous thing to do!) about better cam lobe protection. As I have a desicant system that is used while in the hanger, and recent bore scope has shown zero rust problems. Please let us know whatever you decide about using cam guard long term.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 7:07 pm

by thomasjones42

Just for info, Mike Busch likes CamGuard as an oil additive EXCEPT during engine break-in. Sat in on his briefing on break-in today.
Tom Jones


Re: Camguard

Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 4:35 pm

by GraemeSmith

Yes - but he has no experience of AUTOMOTIVE Camguard in EXPERIMENTAL engines like AeroVee / Rotax / Jabiru.

When I asked Mike about it - it was Mike that put me on to Ed Kollin at ASEL Camguard as the real guru on the topic.

And - YES - not during break in - or you will never get the piston rings to seat.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 5:02 pm

by n502pd

Thanks for asking Mike! I am feeling much better about doing this addition, and do want to see what the differences are in auto vs aviation camguard


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2021 12:09 pm

by pappas

Can someone post a link to the exact TCP product you are using as a fuel additive and the price you are paying from your source? I am finding too many choices and prices that vary wildly.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2021 12:31 pm

by GraemeSmith

pappas wrote:Can someone post a link to the exact TCP product you are using as a fuel additive and the price you are paying from your source? I am finding too many choices and prices that vary wildly.

I use Declain. The dispenser bottle overcomes many of the issues associated with you not wanting to touch the stuff and it measures 1 gradation per gallon of fuel. The only thing to watch for is the bottle caps are a bit brittle and tend to shatter (and so not seal) if knocked about.

https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/ … ecalin.php

Re: Camguard

Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2021 12:45 pm

by pappas

Thanks Graeme. We only use 2.75 Qts of oil in these things. How much Camguard to that?


Re: Camguard

Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2021 3:58 pm

by GraemeSmith

pappas wrote:Thanks Graeme. We only use 2.75 Qts of oil in these things. How much Camguard to that?

Lou - you asked about “TCP” - that’s the Declain that goes in the fuel to scavenge lead.

For the Camguard to go in the oil as a friction modifier - surface protector in a VW engine. You want the AUTOMOTIVE version:

https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/ … autocs.php

I use one 8oz bottle and make up to to 3 1/2 quarts in my oil change (my oil system is bigger than 2 3/4 quarts because of an added filter system).


Re: Camguard

Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2021 11:52 am

by pappas

Since we use Automotive Camguard in the Aerovees, MUST we also use the TCP to scavenge lead out of the 100LL?


Re: Camguard

Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2021 7:09 pm

by GraemeSmith

pappas wrote:Since we use Automotive Camguard in the Aerovees, MUST we also use the TCP to scavenge lead out of the 100LL?

You don’t “must” do anything. I use TCP to keep the plugs clean. Camguard isn’t going to do that.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2021 8:15 pm

by pappas

My plugs always seem to have the right color and I don’t see any loading on them. Maybe because like to run lean. Even on the ground. Plus I replace them every 50 hours, they are cheap.

I’ll start out with the Camguard automotive and monitor the sludge around the sump screen. Hopefully, all my spinny parts will be happier!

Thanks for all the input.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2021 11:21 pm

by WesRagle

Hi Guys,

pappas wrote:My plugs always seem to have the right color and I don’t see any loading on them. Maybe because like to run lean. Even on the ground.

Another point of view concerning TCP.

Scott Casler of Hummel Engines typically builds his engines to 7:1 compression for running on lower octane lead free fuels. I asked him to build my engine with higher compression because I’m lazy and buy 100LL at the airport.

Scott told me point blank, “If you run 100LL you need to use TCP”. Further in the conversation Scott said " The only problem with running straight 100LL is the combustion chamber will lead up over time. Never had any problems with plug fouling."

YMMV.

Wes


Re: Camguard

Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2021 12:07 pm

by pappas

I built my turbo at 7:1 at Kerry’s suggestion. Interesting all the variations and experiences. It’s like reading Golf magazine, (which I don’t do anymore). Every month the articles contradict the very thing they told you to do the previous month! Ain’t life grand!


Re: Camguard

Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 6:40 pm

by pappas

I know a couple of extremely knowledgeable engine builders with 50 years of experience in Harley’s and turbo’d VW strokers, like ours. They suggested that I run AeroShell 100 in my turbo. In fact, in this desert heat, they said to use straight 60 weight and drop to 50W in the winter. They have never had a VW turbo engine failure with this oil. I find that interesting.

Aeroshell is already designed to be used in engines running 100LL. Yes, ours are auto engines, but we do not use them like auto engines. They do not start and stop, on and off the throttle for traffic. We climb and set the throttle to a, relatively stagnant RPM and MAP setting during cruise then taxi in after landing and shut them down.

I am replacing the MOFOCO heads with Sonex’s new EMPI’s, I found a burnt valve in my #3 cylinder, which has always been the hot one, and also found a failing #3 piston. It had a crack under the dome. Replacing all of that next week. I think I will try the Aeroshell for a while and see what happens. Let you all know.


Re: Camguard

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 12:00 pm

by N190YX

The interesting thing about single grade versus multi-grade aircraft engine oils is the multi-grade oils are thinner at low temperatures, which is why we generally use them, but what is not intuitive is the multi-grade oils are thicker at higher temperatures than the single grade oils with the same rating. I learned this at the Phillips booth at Oshkosh where a chart was displayed that showed the viscosity at different temperatures of the single grade SAE 50 oil and the multi-grade Phillips 20W-50. Of course the 20W-50 was thinner at low temperatures but the chart showed it is thicker at higher temperatures than the straight 50 grade. I asked, how can that be, is that accurate? The answer was yes, because the multi-grade oils have thickening agents that keep the oil thicker at higher temperatures. I had been using Phillips 20W-50 for the break in of a newly overhauled TCM engine, and ever since, upon recommendations from the overhauler, with very good results, the engine still uses only 1-2 quarts between 50 hour oil changes, and starts easily in cold weather. (Doesn’t get colder than high 20s here in northern California, but it gets really hot in the summer, need that thicker oil at high temperatures.)


Re: Camguard

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:26 pm

by pappas

Well, I finished replacing the heads on my turbo. Trashed the MOFOCO’s that came with the 2015 engine and replaced them with the EMPI’s that Sonex is now supplying. Also, a new #3 piston, new rings on all pistons, and 4 freshly honed original cylinders.

We match weighted the pistons and wrist pins, ported the heads, and sealed all of the bolts and studs that are through-drilled into the crankcase. I decided to go with Aeroshell 100 for the first 5 hours and will switch to Aeroshell 100 Plus after the rings seat. The aeroshell 100 Plus has the additives already in the oil that Aeroshell put in to do what Camguard does.

3 hours of flight later and I can say that, for the first time, I can climb out at 85-90 mph without any CHT exceeding 365 degrees. (Let alone the 425 deg I was used to seeing in #3). Full rich on climb-out gave me EGT’s in the 1175-1240f range. (Likely too rich, but that is ok for the first 5 hours). My oil pressure is up 8-10 PSI, I think that is from the Aeroshell. Way better compression and the acceleration on the take-off roll is noticeably stronger.

I still have a single, lonely, #1 exhaust pushrod tube seal dripping, but no leaks from the cylinder studs or cylinder bases. I’ll take it!