Flight control assemblies

Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:42 am

by 142YX

Thought I would start up a thread on the flight control system assemblies as i don’t see much guidance in the plans and as i am discovering, there are lots of questions to answer.

I started by putting the major components within the control stick and Waiex tail mixer assemblies together and immediately ran into a problem… the bushings called out in the blueprints did not fit over the powder coated rods. I did not want to ream the bushings out to fit over the diameter of the powder coat as i just felt that was the wrong thing to do. I used the blowtorch method that John Monnett demonstrates in this video and it worked very easily:

http://link.brightcove.com/services/pla … 1439759001

here is first attempt at this process:

wait until the powder coat starts to bubble

and then it comes right off with a wire brush

after that i cleaned the rods with scotch bright to until they shined. after this i found the bearings to have a nice press fit over the rods. (in the below photo the left two have been fully prepared, the right still needs scotch bright)

I didn’t want to re-paint, as that would make disassembly in the future (if i ever need to) a royal pain… so for corrosion protection, i chose to go with a black oxide (took black, gun blueing… same thing) passivation protection layer.

After thoroughly cleaning with denatured alcohol, the bluing went on very easily and very quickly. After 30 seconds, you rinse with water… thats it! I might add that the bluing itself does not provide a tremendous amount of corrosion protection, but seeing as how these are moving assemblies and will be well greased, i am not worried about them.

Here are the final results. I think the only tricky aspect of the bluing is getting a consistent color… perhaps a gunsmith with a lot of experience would do better. But seeing as how i wasn’t doing this for looks i was ok with the outcome.

Bearings being installed… perfect light press fit that went on with a few taps of the mallet.

I am very happy with these results and would recommend it to anyone who hasn’t made up their mind yet… the entire process probably took me about 3 hours including the learning curve. But i am very curious how other people have done this seeing as how there are basically no instructions on what to do within the prints.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:56 am

by 142YX

In order to hold the two “Horn Assemblies” in place, perfectly perpendicular with one another i cut a piece of MDF to the perfect length and held it in place with a wrap of fiberglass strapping tape. I started off with the piece a tad too long and carefully shaved it off on the miter saw until it was just perfect. On my assembly, the length ended up being 15 and 1/4 inches

This held things in place very well while the control stick link was drilled to maintain perpendicularity.

However, i have now encountered question #2… the control stick link hits the trim spring tab before the roll stops hit the frame (in both directions) and this cant be right:

Did this happen to anybody else? what did you do? i have emailed Kerry about it and ill post here what he says.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:28 am

by N111YX

Let me first say that I enjoy these pics. Takes me back to the old building days… :smiley:

As for the powdercoated tubing, I removed the coating with sandpaper (I did not know about the blowtorch method) and when the assembly was put back together, I taped over the bearings and gave the bare tubing a shot of spray paint. Your method looks nice.

Regarding the control assembly, I love the idea of the wood block to help make it perpendicular…wish I had thought of it… :oops: . Not sure about the contact. Mine did not have that problem. The next time the seat is out, I’ll see how close it is.

I failed to get pictures of my fuel system over the weekend when I did an oil change. I TWICE though about getting the camera out but before I could I either cut my hand on something then had some visitors pop in causing me to forget. However, I plan to do some winter maintneance soon and I’ll try to get some pics…


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:00 am

by 142YX

Kerry got back to me about the contacting control stick link:

There is a very high likelihood neither of those contact points will be an
issue once your aircraft is rigged. The aileron bellcranks have their own
stops built in and these often come in to play before the ones on the
sticks.

We recommend you continue with your build and if those contact prevents you
from properly rigging your ailerons we can solve that problem then.

I think this is reasonable… i would expect any flight control system to bottom out at the surface, before the control in the cockpit… safer design that way.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:20 am

by N111YX

Hmmm. That answer seems odd to me. I can’t recall hard stops in the bellcrank area. Also, if the stop is not in the control stick area, would the pilot not be tranferring lot’s of force throughout the system counterring a “stop” that occurs way out on the wings…?


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:01 pm

by 142YX

My understanding of reversible flight control systems is that you always want to be at your limit of travel at the control surface… with a little bit of motion left at the point of input (control stick) so that if something goes wrong for whatever reason… you have a little bit of margin on your control authority to muscle it to the ground. Having the limit hit at the stick first, with some margin left at the control surface would not do you any good if some in-flight failure resulted in a loss of control authority. Hopefully the system has been sized so that maximum pilot effort will not break anything.

There are some stops on the aileron bell-cranks in the wing… that little piece of phenolic that is sandwiched between the two aluminum brackets (i can grab a photo tonight) i always assumed to be a limit stop. There is only a stop in one direction, because the other aileron will stop in the other direction. And the ribs are re-enforced at the bell crank location with those back side stiffeners that are riveted to the wing skin. The question left to answer is if that stop is hit before i run in to my stick assembly clearance issue, but i wont know that until i have the whole system put together…


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:34 pm

by N111YX

Interesting. I never thought of the phenolic bits as stops but rather mere spacers. Just going from memory, I would think that the travel of the bellcrank would be extreme to make contact…


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:41 pm

by N111YX

Well, here are mine. I see the stop feature now… :slight_smile:


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:34 pm

by sonex892

N111YX wrote:Interesting. I never thought of the phenolic bits as stops but rather mere spacers. Just going from memory, I would think that the travel of the bellcrank would be extreme to make contact…

The reason we would presume they are only spacers is because they are only referred to in the plans as spacers. Just re-adjusted my ailerons yesterday and couldnt get the bellcrank to bottom out on the spacers, or stops any way :cry:

Kip you mentioned earlier of using a taper pin instead of the bolt in the joystick mount. My joystick has just gotten sloppy again so I plan on doing the same. Did you use #2 or # 3 taper pin? I’m thinking of going #3.

Steve 892


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:43 pm

by N111YX

I don’t recall the exact size pin, Steve. I have the benefit of living close to Aircraft Spruce where I can handle stuff like that in person to see what works. I think the catalogs have some good diagrams with dimensions along the pin so maybe that will work for you. We’re talking about replacing an AN-4 bolt, right? It does get rid of that slop… :slight_smile:

sonex892 wrote:

N111YX wrote:Interesting. I never thought of the phenolic bits as stops but rather mere spacers. Just going from memory, I would think that the travel of the bellcrank would be extreme to make contact…

The reason we would presume they are only spacers is because they are only referred to in the plans as spacers. Just re-adjusted my ailerons yesterday and couldnt get the bellcrank to bottom out on the spacers, or stops any way :cry:

Kip you mentioned earlier of using a taper pin instead of the bolt in the joystick mount. My joystick has just gotten sloppy again so I plan on doing the same. Did you use #2 or # 3 taper pin? I’m thinking of going #3.

Steve 892

Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:27 am

by sonex892

No worries and thanks Kip. Yes we are talking about removing the AN4 bolt in the joystick. Gee I wish I was as close to ACS as you. According to google I’m 11,850km from my nearest ACS outlet, thats direct.

The # 2 taper pin will be best with dimensions slightly larger than the 1/4" bolt. I’ll order the #2 reamer, a pin or two and also some chromoly to remake the part if needed.

Steve 892


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:01 am

by 142YX

I also plan on using a #2 taper pin on my control sicks


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:43 am

by 142YX

Here is my idea for holding the control sticks straight while drilling the attachment. I used the same piece of MDF that i used to keep the horn assemblies parallel, additionally with a 3/16" think pice of scrap aluminum to make up for the difference in thickness

Here you can see the entire assembly clamped down to my (very clean, neat, and organized) work bench for easy drilling

This worked really well, the sticks came out pretty straight.

Also, i changed my mind from my above post. I just used #1 (AN386-1-8) taper pins for the control stick assemblies. I liked very much how the tail mixer came out which made me go in this direction, and i am convinced that a #1 is strong enough for this assembly (vice a #2). If i run into trouble with this in the future, I can always upsize to a #2 taper pin, or a -4 bolt. But i really like how they came out! There is absolutely zero slide to side slop in the stick attachment. The right stick only has the faintest amount of fore-aft slop, due to the stick tube being ever so slightly larger than the horn assembly… it is so small i may do nothing about it… but my gut tells me ill be doing something about that before to long. Had i used a bolt, i could tighten the crap out of it and likely eliminate the fore-aft slop… but then i think the whole assembly would be more prone to side-to-side slop developing over time.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 11:18 am

by falvarez

Your setup looks great and the photos are quite helpful. I’m still a couple months away from installing my controls so I’m still a little unclear on the use of the taper pin…can you please help clarify? Is the pin used to help with clearance issues that would be present with a bolt? Or is it used to provide a more secure connection? Or something else?

Also, has anyone come up with a good way to make the passenger stick removable? If I can come up with a straight forward solution I would like to have the option of removing the stick as needed.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:39 pm

by 142YX

I used the taper pin because in my opinion, getting a “good tight fit” with a bolt is a very hard thing to do on tube-over-tube connections. If you simply use a 1/4" drill bit to drill a hole for an AN4 bolt… you can be assured that it will wobble all over the place. AN4 bolts are all undersized, and vary +/- 1 or 2 thousandths of an inch… most of the time when i measure them they are .247 - .248". For any structural, single shear AN4 bolt in the fuselage, i have been using a .248" reamer as my final operation to get a “good tight fit”. But with the tube over tube assembly you have to cut two holes, one on each side of the tube. It has been my experience that if i am not doing this on a drill press… the “first side” hole tends to get larger than the “back side hole” during the drilling process. If the hole gets even 1 or 2 thousandths of an inch larger than it should be… there will be some slop/wobble which i do not want in the flight controls.

My description is pretty lousy… so here is a picture of what i am trying to say

Now if you use an AN4 bolt, you can tighten the crap out of it, deforming everything slightly, and introducing friction between the inner and outer tube which might be enough to prevent any feel of slop… but over time this assembly will have a greater potential to wear and get even more sloppy. I like the taper pin because you cant accidentally screw up the first hole, it is much easier to get a very tight fitting hole so that you do not have to rely on friction to eliminate slop.

Either way is probably fine, i have just convinced myself that this is better for me. Whatever way you choose to go, removing the passenger stick will only require removing the bolt/taper pin to get the stick off… but it might be a good idea to make a collar of some kind to slide over the now exposed horn assembly to prevent the bushings from backing out. The control stick being on there holds everything together.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:20 pm

by falvarez

Great description and diagram…that makes it quite clear. Just one more thing for me to consider now :slight_smile:


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 4:28 pm

by N111YX

The taper pins took out all of my slop in the sticks. I could not stand having the stick move 1/8th inch before it did anything. The Waiex uses one in the mixer because flutter would be catastrophic. Looks good, Nick!


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 10:41 pm

by fastj22

I had the same issue as Kip. Too much slop.
I decided to just weld the pieces together since I have a MIG welder and know how to use it.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:14 am

by 142YX

Tonight i started to rig my pitch control. The plans (this is for the Waiex only) say to place a 1/16" shim in between the stick frame and the spar box, and with the tail mixer fully forward drill the required bushing hole for the idler-to-mixer rod. I misunderstood what the plans meant by the 1/16" shim and did this at first… it became obvious that it wouldn’t work because the idler-to-mixer rod was in the wrong spot at the mixer end.

I didn’t realize until this moment that the stick assembly goes over the spar when full forward. The instructions must have meant to put a 1/16" shim between the actual stick frame (and not like the forward most point of the stick like the above).

The problem that i ran into with this approach is that the entire assembly bottomed out at the idler before the stick frame was within 1/16" of the spar box. Because of this, i put a small shim in front of the idler and used this as my forward-most stick position for rigging. This made everything come out, from the best i can tell, correctly.

Now for the other problem i ran into. The ruder-vator push rods bottomed out by the spherical rod-ends hitting against their upper safety washer before the assembly moved all the way to the aft stop. Sorry about the bad photo… it was very hard to get a picture of this:

You can see here more clearly what is bottoming out. In this photo, i have two standard washers above the spherical bearing and it still bottomed out (the prints call for only one). It took THREE washers above the spherical to get all the way to the aft stop, and i find this to be somewhat ridiculous.

Waiex builders, did you have this problem? what did you do?


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:35 am

by sonex892

142YX wrote:Now if you use an AN4 bolt, you can tighten the crap out of it, deforming everything slightly, and introducing friction between the inner and outer tube which might be enough to prevent any feel of slop…

Overtightening this bolt didnt work for me. It possibly just squashes and ovals the 3/4" tube making the situation worse. ie Bigger gap top and bottom between the tubes.
I understand that fore and aft slop may also still be a problem with one taper pin. I think the fore and aft play here could be eliminated by using 2 small taper pins one from the left and one from the right. Providing there is enough room of course :?:

Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:17 am

by N111YX

I have never felt fore/aft (pitch) slop in the few Sonex aircraft that I have flown. For some reason, it’s not a problem like with the left/right. The taper pins solve all slop…

sonex892 wrote:

142YX wrote:Now if you use an AN4 bolt, you can tighten the crap out of it, deforming everything slightly, and introducing friction between the inner and outer tube which might be enough to prevent any feel of slop…

Overtightening this bolt didnt work for me. It possibly just squashes and ovals the 3/4" tube making the situation worse. ie Bigger gap top and bottom between the tubes.
I understand that fore and aft slop may also still be a problem with one taper pin. I think the fore and aft play here could be eliminated by using 2 small taper pins one from the left and one from the right. Providing there is enough room of course :?:


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:20 am

by N111YX

I recall many YX’ers having this problem. I forget how many washers I used but I’ll see if I can peek back there when I’m back home in a few days…

142YX wrote:Tonight i started to rig my pitch control. The plans (this is for the Waiex only) say to place a 1/16" shim in between the stick frame and the spar box, and with the tail mixer fully forward drill the required bushing hole for the idler-to-mixer rod. I misunderstood what the plans meant by the 1/16" shim and did this at first… it became obvious that it wouldn’t work because the idler-to-mixer rod was in the wrong spot at the mixer end.

I didn’t realize until this moment that the stick assembly goes over the spar when full forward. The instructions must have meant to put a 1/16" shim between the actual stick frame (and not like the forward most point of the stick like the above).

The problem that i ran into with this approach is that the entire assembly bottomed out at the idler before the stick frame was within 1/16" of the spar box. Because of this, i put a small shim in front of the idler and used this as my forward-most stick position for rigging. This made everything come out, from the best i can tell, correctly.

Now for the other problem i ran into. The ruder-vator push rods bottomed out by the spherical rod-ends hitting against their upper safety washer before the assembly moved all the way to the aft stop. Sorry about the bad photo… it was very hard to get a picture of this:

You can see here more clearly what is bottoming out. In this photo, i have two standard washers above the spherical bearing and it still bottomed out (the prints call for only one). It took THREE washers above the spherical to get all the way to the aft stop, and i find this to be somewhat ridiculous.

Waiex builders, did you have this problem? what did you do?


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:34 am

by checkn6

.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:34 am

by checkn6

.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:35 am

by kmacht

If I am reading it correctly your tube for the tailwheel bracket is larger than the diameter of the tailwheel titanium rod? My setups was like this. What I ended up doing was coating the titanium rod with some epoxy to fill the extra space and then putting the tube over it. The epoxy stays in compression since it is trapped in the tube and should hold up just fine. The bolt is still there to take any force placed on the connection. If I ever have to replace the tailwheel rod I will just also have to replace the bracket. If the epoxy breaks down I can just pull it all apart, clean it up and re-apply some new epoxy. I think a few people have also made shims to go in there but am not sure how they kept them in place.

Keith
#554


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:39 pm

by falvarez

I too was planning on filling that void with epoxy (and some flox, but that’s just because I have some laying around). Just an FYI…epoxy will break down with extreme heat so if you want to take it back apart, simply heat the part with a heat gun and you should be able to separate them.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:27 pm

by checkn6

.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:00 pm

by sonex892

checkn6 wrote:For those that are in the know, perhaps this is a good place to ask about a minor concern.

I mounted my tail wheel bracket to the end of my rear fuselage and also drilled the titanium rod that fits inside. When I was done the bolt was nice and snug but there was a lot of play between the tube and the titanium rod. I’m not sure if a taper pin would help here because the rod is not a snug fit in the tube to begin with.

Would a taper pin help, or what are others doing/done to remove the excess play?

Thanks,

Chris
SNX 1372

Being an electrician I just wrapped insulation tape around the titanium tailspring and used bolts. :roll: 400 landings later still as tight as the day it was installed.

I used a taper pin on the tailspring on my sonerai, a similar setup to the sonex. It worked great. The spring wasnt a loose fit in the socket like the sonerai. The taper pin was just used to stop the rotational slop.
Steve 892


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:31 am

by 142YX

In my research on taper pins, i came across this RV builder who used a taper pin on his landing gear… you could do the same thing for the Sonex tail rod.

http://www.matronics.com/wiki/index.php/Nose_Gear_Strut

Here is a source for shim stock. I was going to do this on my tail wheel (mine is very loose as well)

http://www.mcmaster.com/#standard-shims/=komc35


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 2:51 am

by 142YX

Worked on the Flap control Torque Tube tonight. I thought that the phenolic pillow blocks that i made had a great fit (i just stepped up to a 1" drill bit to cut the hole) but as soon as i tightened them into the fuselage with the torque tube in place, they bound really bad and it took all of my strength to get the tube to turn (obviously not acceptable).

Fearing the cost of a few oversized 1" reamers to try in hopes of improving things, i tried lightly opening up the holes with sandpaper, which probably would have worked, but was taking forever and i did fear that i would oval the blocks badly.

I then removed the powder coat paint from the area of the blocks (using the same blow torch method) to get the torque tube a little bit thinner… this improved things but it was still much to tight.

The next thing i tried was a very silly idea involving gluing a paper spacer in between the blocks to make them ever so farther apart from one another. This did not work at all.

Then i though a little harder about it and actually came up with a good idea, and that was to use a brake cylinder hone like the one you can get from McMaster Carr for $16 http://www.mcmaster.com/#hones/=kp5t5z

The hone worked great. In just a few iterations i was able to dial the holes into a nice slip fit without making them go all eccentric, like what would have happened if i tried to do it by hand

With the proper fit done, i got to work with the die grinder cutting off the center bracket as i will not be installing a center flap handle.

I once again used the gun-blueing on the sections of bare metal that i have exposed, and then masked off the bearing area and have primer drying on the tube. After a top coat of paint, it will be ready for installation tomorrow.

Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:00 pm

by checkn6

.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:54 pm

by N111YX

How about just loosening the bolts a bit + some grease? The assembly is not going anywhere…:slight_smile:


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:45 am

by 142YX

I tried going very loose on the bolts, but for my setup, just shy of what i would consider “too loose” ended up still being a bit tight for the tube.

I was over thinking everything until i thought of the hone - thats for sure. With the hone it took less than 5 minutes of tweaking to get a great fit.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:06 pm

by EricS

Okay all,

I’m currently working on the control assembly and Waiex mixer. I’ve installed the 5/8" ID x 3/4" OD bushings in the control tree and have removed the powder coating from the control horns (SNX-C04-08). However, I still cannot push in the control horn due to a really tight fit. The plans say to line ream the bushings to obtain a “snug but freely rotating fit.”

Any suggestions on what to use to line ream these bushings? I don’t think they will need much, but it’s a small enough diameter that it is hard to get sandpaper inside to ream them evenly.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 6:26 pm

by MichaelFarley56

Sorry I can’t help you more on this one Eric, but I believe the sandpaper thing is all I could figure out. I took a small sheet and rolled it up, put it into the brass bushing, and then just twisted it around for a while. If you do this, be careful though; I was able to get my passenger stick perfect with no slop, but my pilot side bushing is reamed a little too much and I have a little slop. Not enough to worry about, but one day I’ll take it apart and replace those bushings and ream them again. That job is sort of a PITA so good luck! I’m sure there’s a better way but I never could figure it out…

Sorry!


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:24 pm

by EricS

Mike, that is kinda what I figured. I don’t really want to buy a 5/8" reamer just for that because it is such a small amount of material that needs to be taken off. But like you said, I just don’t want to get any excessive slop in the system…if I can prevent it.

Thanks for the reply!


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 3:19 pm

by saddler

I am starting on the control assemblies part of the build. I have read through this thread and appreciate the great info. I have everything fit and ready to drill. I don’t want to rush this so thought I’d ask a question first.

How are you guys drilling for these taper pins? Is everybody spending the big bucks on the tapered reamers? I am building a Waiex so the plans call for the taper pin in the mixer assembly but thought I might put them in the control sticks as suggested in this thread. I just need some instruction on how to drill/install them.

Thanks!


Flight control assemblies

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 8:50 am

by Sonex1517

You mean kinda like this…?

http://sonexfoundation.com/uploads/Seber_Taper_Pin_Installation.pdf

Robbie Culver
Sonex 1517
Chicagoland
Tails and Wings complete - finishing fuselage.
N1517S reserved


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 9:38 am

by saddler

Yep that’s basically what I have found so far. Thanks for the info! For anyone that hasn’t already found out, Aircraft Tool Supply has the reamer for $30 which is considerably cheaper than ACS.

Ordering now…


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 11:45 am

by Rynoth

saddler wrote:Yep that’s basically what I have found so far. Thanks for the info! For anyone that hasn’t already found out, Aircraft Tool Supply has the reamer for $30 which is considerably cheaper than ACS.

Ordering now…

That’s what I bought, though I haven’t got to the point of using it yet. It sure looks like it will do the trick.

Flight control assemblies

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 1:13 am

by Sonex1517

saddler wrote:Yep that’s basically what I have found so far. Thanks for the info! For anyone that hasn’t already found out, Aircraft Tool Supply has the reamer for $30 which is considerably cheaper than ACS.

Ordering now…

You are very welcome. This is why we have worked so hard to build the Sonex Builders and Pilots Foundation - so we can all share this kind of information. We all can work to make the community grow, but we need everyone’s help to add more content just like this.

Robbie Culver
Sonex 1517
Chicagoland
Tails and Wings complete - finishing fuselage.
N1517S reserved


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 9:26 pm

by Bryan Cotton

EricS wrote:Okay all,

I’m currently working on the control assembly and Waiex mixer. I’ve installed the 5/8" ID x 3/4" OD bushings in the control tree and have removed the powder coating from the control horns (SNX-C04-08). However, I still cannot push in the control horn due to a really tight fit. The plans say to line ream the bushings to obtain a “snug but freely rotating fit.”

Any suggestions on what to use to line ream these bushings? I don’t think they will need much, but it’s a small enough diameter that it is hard to get sandpaper inside to ream them evenly.

Eric,
Sorry for being 30 months late on the answer. I used a piece of 5/8" stock that was a little smaller than the weldment. Some Nuvite F9 used as lapping compound did the trick nicely. First on the stock, next on the weldment. Worked great!

On my project thread Robbie mentioned taper pins and that search brought me here. So I am wondering if I should put taper pins in my sticks. My fit is nice right now.

142YX, I wish your pictures were still up.


Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 10:52 pm

by Sonex1517

Taper pin installation

http://www.sonexfoundation.com/uploads/ … lation.pdf

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2016 1:10 am

by WaiexN143NM

Hi Bryan,
Are u sure they are snug, the sticks with an bolts in them? Thats what i thought, and everything snugged up . Then wiggle them! Whoa! Wait a minute! Sloppy sticks. Get some taper pins , acs, and there is special washers also to go along with castle nuts an cotter pins. Yep not cheap. Got to buy tapered reamers too, a few cause not sure which one i needed. Omg the tool box is filling up!
Cant wait to see u fly! All this will make your smile even wider. Great job with adam.

WaiexN143NM
Michael


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2016 2:03 am

by WaiexN143NM

Also, not sure where N142YX went. I dont think on these boards any more . I saw him at the KMHV fly in a couple months ago ( had some interesting mods on his green machine waiex. Was running the bing carb , he gave up on a couple different tbi’s, i mentioned hacman for his bing (green sky adventures?)for mixture control. Running a bigger spinner from jabiriu, and dual jabiriu muffler exhausts. I think they may keep him busy at scaled composites out in mojave.


Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:39 am

by Sonex1517

I have the reamer required for the taper pins, Bryan.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:29 pm

by pgerhardt

What size is the reamer ? I need to replace a 1/4 bolt not a new build.

Paul
N148YX


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:45 pm

by sonex892.

pgerhardt wrote:What size is the reamer ? I need to replace a 1/4 bolt not a new build.

Paul
N148YX

I used a # 2 B&S reamer for the #2 taper pin, to replace that 1/4" bolt.

Somebody earlier in another thread viewtopic.php?f=21&p=29368#p29368 said you can use a #1 reamer for a #2 pin?


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 8:21 pm

by Sonex1517

pgerhardt wrote:What size is the reamer ? I need to replace a 1/4 bolt not a new build.

Paul
N148YX

The article Eric Seber wrote had a link to the reamer a and sizes. See if this helps
http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/topages/reamers.php?clickkey=73650


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 1:52 pm

by jrs

I am finishing the connections to my mixer and have an issue with the Idler to Mixer pushrod. I bent the washers on the Ruddervator pushrods per the thread here. That resolved the conflict on those but now the nut on mixer push rod is contacting the Ruddervator rods when right rudder is applied. There are two sets of holes in the mixer assembly and the plans show using only the inner set of holes. Has anyone had/resolved this problem or alternately used the outboard set of holes ?

Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:33 pm

by Area 51%

Not sure what the outboard holes are for, but I doubt the pushrods would clear the bulkhead holes if located there.

I’m at this same point in my build and just crawled under the beast to look at the mixer and attachments. I don’t see how the idler-to-mixer bolt could contact the mixer-to-ruddervator pushrod bolts unless you have an unusually tall stack of washers. I’m seeing at least 1/2in clearance between the two.

Like most, I assume, I’ve deformed the “captive” 970 washers to miss the rod end.
The clearance issue I’m facing is at close to full up deflection of the mixer. The AN960 stand-off washer is coming in contact with the bushing area of the rod end. Not by a lot, but it is binding before contact with the up stop. The only way I’ve been able to get full up at the mixer without the “pinch”, is to reduce the diameter of the 960 washer to about .420in. I’m sure higher quality rod ends would allow enough movement so I wouldn’t have to “massage” a spacer washer, but that’s not the dish ACS served up in the hardware kit.

Mike January, the president of the Florida Sonex Association, sent me a series of pictures of his mixer/pushrods installation to compare with what I’m experiencing. PM me your email and I’ll forward them to you.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 12:28 pm

by Zack

142YX wrote:Now for the other problem i ran into. The ruder-vator push rods bottomed out by the spherical rod-ends hitting against their upper safety washer before the assembly moved all the way to the aft stop. Sorry about the bad photo… it was very hard to get a picture of this:

You can see here more clearly what is bottoming out. In this photo, i have two standard washers above the spherical bearing and it still bottomed out (the prints call for only one). It took THREE washers above the spherical to get all the way to the aft stop, and i find this to be somewhat ridiculous.

Waiex builders, did you have this problem? what did you do?

For the benefit of others: I ordered 3068-03 3/16 inch rod end retaining washers. https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/produ … oduct=3068


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 12:56 pm

by Area 51%

Saw these in Sport Aviation (I think) recently. Have mine on order. They look like the answer.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 1:35 pm

by Bryan Cotton

Those fancy washers look very nice. You can also use a bolt and a small washer to press the AN fender washer into the right size socket and do the same thing.

I’ve done this a few times.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 4:05 pm

by Area 51%

I could never get a satisfactory flat spot in the middle for the bolt head to rest in.

It was probably the metric sockets I was using.


Re: Flight control assemblies

Posted: Fri May 08, 2020 4:40 pm

by Bryan Cotton

One thing I think I did was to use a short bolt, a small washer on both sides of the fender washer, and a nut socked down tight. Mine came out good, but of course my standards drop all the time as this project draws out!

And for goodness sake don’t use a metric socket.